• ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    Their reasoning about getting around the law is that if it’s commercially available, it isn’t government surveillance. And I can’t really argue with that. It’s immoral but it’s not illegal.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      Well, we could pass a law, or even ammendment, that defines a kind of bill of rights for digital data privacy.

      But that would require a functioning, non corrupt government.

      Which would have required countermanding Citizens United with something similar.

      But nope, instead we have a corrupt system that cannot be fixed from the inside, that now is just openly, nakedly corrupt and arbitrary.

      • UnimportantHuman@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        Our bill of rights really should extend to digital data by default… Technology is so integrated into our lives our phones and computers should be treated as our personal offices with your own property. I feel like grabbing our data from us from our personal spaces challenges the fourth amendment.