• forrgott@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Well, no, referring to our government as a democracy is factually incorrect. A democratic republic shares many things with a democracy, but the fact is a republic is built specifically to deny the public any actual direct voice in the government. So, not a democracy, no matter how much you dress it up to look like one.

    • thinkercharmercoderfarmer@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      I think what you’re describing is usually called direct democracy. If that’s the only kind of democracy you think is real democracy, I guess we’ll have to differ. I think there’s nothing inherently undemocratic about having elected representatives perform certain functions. I think at some scale it helps to have middle layers more than it hurts. That’s not to say direct democracy wouldn’t be preferable, I don’t know that I have a well-formed opinion on that. But if a system has consequential elections, no matter the structure of the government they elect, I’d call that a democracy.

      • forrgott@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        As I recall, the technicality that separates the two involves any election done in the manner of our electoral college. The president is not elected by the people, by design.