• roofuskit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    This is why other countries have day fines. If fines were proportional to income wealthy people couldn’t just keep swatting them like mosquitoes.

    It also seems like people have figured out the limitations of camera fines and how they have no effect on your license.

    • RamRabbit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      The other five have paid off little or none, and owe, on average, $19,400 each — a total of $97,000, the data revealed.

      The article states a bunch of the fines aren’t even paid; the fuck is NYC doing?

      • roofuskit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        Most state laws around camera fines are was softer than those from tickets issued by people. For one a camera cannot identify the driver of the vehicle so it’s not technically a traffic violation on anyone’s license, it’s a fine levied against the owner of the vehicle.

        These laws restrict what actions they can take against the vehicle owner because there’s no proof they were driving.

        • kungen@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          If you have no idea who’s using your car to break laws repeatedly, shouldn’t it be impounded?

          Weird how a photograph wouldn’t be able to identify a driver… sure, you can cast doubt, but unless you’re wearing a mask it still should hold up in court…?

          • Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            The camera isn’t always facing the front of the vehicle, and even when it is, glare on the windscreen can obscure the driver.

            Your first point absolutely stands though