Most people read biased summaries based on Bill Barr’s misleading statements. A few people read the report summaries for Part I and Part II, which downplay the severity of Trump’s misconduct. But the actual text, and footnotes, really show just how corrupt Trump was in 2015-16 and how much he relied on foreign interference from Russian intelligence to win that thing. And then hide it with a coverup run by DOJ (which was then Jeff Sessions as AG).
He had enough evidence to state the conclusion clearly.
It’s obvious he wanted Congress to do that part, but he still needed to say it.
Even so, he did fight the good fight, and I’m not going to hate a man for a slight miscalculation of strategy that only became obvious with hindsight.
Most people read biased summaries based on Bill Barr’s misleading statements. A few people read the report summaries for Part I and Part II, which downplay the severity of Trump’s misconduct. But the actual text, and footnotes, really show just how corrupt Trump was in 2015-16 and how much he relied on foreign interference from Russian intelligence to win that thing. And then hide it with a coverup run by DOJ (which was then Jeff Sessions as AG).