- cross-posted to:
- world@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- world@lemmy.world
On 5 March, a post appeared on the X account of Iran’s late supreme leader, Ali Khamenei, managed by his staff after he was killed in an Israeli airstrike on 28 February. The tweet featured a stark piece of propaganda: a gleaming, oversized missile arcing across the sky as a city below is engulfed in flames. The caption read: “Khorramshahr moments are on the horizon.”
The Khorramshahr missile, Iran’s most advanced ballistic missile, is believed to be capable of carrying a cluster warhead dispersing up to 80 submunitions. Since that post, it has come to loom large in Israeli threat assessments, a persistent concern for a country equipped with a multi-layered missile defence system that is widely regarded as the world’s most sophisticated.
The latest attack using cluster munitions occurred on Sunday, when an Iranian ballistic missile struck central Israel, injuring 15 people.
According to the Israel Defense Forces, roughly half of the missiles launched from Iran since the escalation have carried cluster warheads.
The Guardian, which reviewed the impact of dozens of Iranian strikes alongside statements from Israeli officials, has identified at least 19 ballistic missiles carrying cluster warheads that penetrated Israeli airspace and struck urban areas since the beginning of the war with Iran on 28 February. Those attacks have killed at least nine people and wounded dozens, reflecting a broader shift in Iran’s tactics that appears to have exposed a vulnerability in Israel’s air defences. Since the start of the war, Iran’s cluster munitions – which disperse dozens of bomblets mid-air – have tested Israel’s highly advanced, multi-tier missile defence network, including Iron Dome, which is designed to counter threats across ranges, altitudes and speeds, exposing gaps that interception alone has struggled to close.


The local muslims were mostly unhappy, the local jews were mostly happy.
They weren’t wrong in their complaints, but so were the other people that didn’t fully get what they want when the other countries were formed after the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire.
Some of those countries came out reasonably ‘clean’, and others came out fighting internally and externally. Mostly because of ethnic and religious disputes over borders and autonomy.
Thats just not accurate at all, and your framing it that way is deceptive to the point of trying to whitewash what actually happened… It wasnt some sort of deal that some people were happy about and some werent. It was the murderous displacement of 700,000 people out of their homes and villages. It was the same thing they are doing now only worse. Its the precise cause of the last 80 years of conflict.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nakba