supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz to politics @lemmy.world · 2 days agoKamala Harris might run for president again in 2028. Please, no | Arwa Mahdawiwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square317fedilinkarrow-up1584arrow-down124
arrow-up1560arrow-down1external-linkKamala Harris might run for president again in 2028. Please, no | Arwa Mahdawiwww.theguardian.comsupersquirrel@sopuli.xyz to politics @lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square317fedilink
minus-squareAbyssian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up16·2 days agoIt’s not debatable from a legal standpoint at all. He can’t legally run. That’s all.
minus-squareagent_nycto@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 day agoSorry, forgot to put sarcastic quote marks over “highly debatable”
minus-squareAnUnusualRelic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 days agoAnd that’s a problem how, exactly?
minus-squareAbyssian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 days agoIt’s a problem when people act like there’s some potential legality in him running, because no the fuck there is not?
minus-squareWindex007@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·2 days agoStrictly speaking, does the law say he can’t run, or can’t be elected again?
minus-squareAbyssian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 days agoIf you’re ineligible to be elected, you’re ineligible to run.
minus-squareAnUnusualRelic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 day agoYou know how there’s theory, and then there’s practice?
It’s not debatable from a legal standpoint at all. He can’t legally run. That’s all.
Sorry, forgot to put sarcastic quote marks over “highly debatable”
And that’s a problem how, exactly?
It’s a problem when people act like there’s some potential legality in him running, because no the fuck there is not?
Strictly speaking, does the law say he can’t run, or can’t be elected again?
If you’re ineligible to be elected, you’re ineligible to run.
You know how there’s theory, and then there’s practice?