I store all of my passwords in firefox’s built-in password manager. They auto-fill into websites, sync to my phone, notify me if one appears publicly, and I can generate strong new passwords conveniently. The pw vault is stored encrypted in the cloud as far as I know, but I don’t really know the technical details. I presume that it’s just as secure as using a “proper” manager.
Is there a problem with not using a dedicated password manager? I used to use LastPass but then… I stopped. And at the time I didn’t see anything wrong with just sticking with FF.
Using Firefox is fine right? If so, what’s the benefit of something like BitWarden/etc over the built-in one?
well yes, as I said I’ve used browser extensions for dedicated managers before, and I’m aware of KeePass. But my question is more about whether that’s better somehow than firefox. i.e. more secure/convenient/etc. I ask because in my armchair experience the built-in one is completely fine and idk what the advantage of a dedicated manager is over the built-in one.
The question is two-fold. How secure do you want the password to be determines what system to use.
For example:
Banking - I never store a password or username for these. It’s always one I can remember. The password is lengthy, multi-factor authentification is turned on etc… I don’t trust any system.
Finanial webpages other than banks, , taxes, healthcare, etc, stuff that would hurt me personally if stolen, I use a stand alone password manager.
Anything else goes into Firefox password manager. Stuff I don’t give a fuck about if somebody hacks my password.