it’s a slow process for americans. you have to give them a bit more time. that’s why these protests are being held on saturdays and not weekdays. they can’t afford to protest on weekdays. add to the fact they have zero leadership. there’s no one rallying them. Bernie is too preoccupied with billionaires, aoc and crockett are too preoccupied with getting good sound bites/quotes in the media.
Time is never “up” to protest and effect change even with non-violent means: that is a false limitation based on an arbitrary, non-existent standard set by an internet rando with another agenda of his own, that is itself based on either ignorance (unlikely) or the desire to see real movements delegitimized and written off as groups of “disgruntled hooligans” even as it gives the government full legal authority to come in with armed occupation to “quell the uprising.”
The National Guard got kicked out of both Portland and LA last year BECAUSE those cities could prove that their protests were non-violent. That is literally written into the judges’ orders forbidding NG presence in both states.
If you want to see violence in the street at this point in time, you’re not on the side of the protests. That only serves the overlords.
And here you are with your month old account littering threads with the same old pro-violence chaff we saw in December and January.
it’s a slow process for americans. you have to give them a bit more time. that’s why these protests are being held on saturdays and not weekdays. they can’t afford to protest on weekdays. add to the fact they have zero leadership. there’s no one rallying them. Bernie is too preoccupied with billionaires, aoc and crockett are too preoccupied with getting good sound bites/quotes in the media.
So it’s a slow process.
Thank goodness the Nepalese and Iranians who protested within the last year were all rich and faced no potential for harm.
Times up. We had a year, now they are doing public executions on citizens without repercussions.
Time is never “up” to protest and effect change even with non-violent means: that is a false limitation based on an arbitrary, non-existent standard set by an internet rando with another agenda of his own, that is itself based on either ignorance (unlikely) or the desire to see real movements delegitimized and written off as groups of “disgruntled hooligans” even as it gives the government full legal authority to come in with armed occupation to “quell the uprising.”
The National Guard got kicked out of both Portland and LA last year BECAUSE those cities could prove that their protests were non-violent. That is literally written into the judges’ orders forbidding NG presence in both states.
If you want to see violence in the street at this point in time, you’re not on the side of the protests. That only serves the overlords.
And here you are with your month old account littering threads with the same old pro-violence chaff we saw in December and January.
Piss off chorklefuck.
When you got nothing, there’s always the old ad hominem. Thanks for proving me right.