• James R Kirk@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    That’s a lot of words to not provide a single example from a show of what makes “forced inclusion” different than “inclusion”

    EDIT: Before anyone bothers clicking through the replies, he never actually explains himself or why he’s parroting a common right wing buzz-phrase to discourage the presence of minorities in media.

      • James R Kirk@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        I saw that but I didn’t see anything about what makes inclusion “forced” in one series but not in another.

        • JasSmith@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          I thought I did a reasonable job of explaining the narrative distinction in my comment. Maybe you could be specific about which part you don’t understand, or which part with which you might disagree?

          • James R Kirk@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            yeah sure so im curious to know what “forced inclusion” means and how we’re supposed to tell it apart from regular inclusion.

            • ContriteErudite@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              I can’t speak for the other poster, but the way I see is is that “forced inclusion” is where the script directs viewer attention to it in a protracted, unnatural manner that is not pertinent to the plot. For instance, the script may be as blunt as a character saying “Wow, I can’t believe you made it this far despite being a [marginalized out-group],” or it could be a little more subtle by offering a stereotyped representation of [marginalized out-group] without any kind of deeper exploration. i.e. Tokenism

              Star Trek, for the most part, dove into social subjects deeper, more meaningful way than other media at the time. Like other users have pointed out, TOS confronted racism and gender roles head on by placing a black female character on the bridge. By never drawing attention to those traits, the show issued such a strong rebuke against racism and male chauvinism that no more needed to be said. In my view, that is inclusion that is not forced upon the viewer; it is implied, but unless the viewer is explicitly looking for it, they’d never notice.

              • James R Kirk@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 days ago

                For instance, the script may be as blunt as a character saying “Wow, I can’t believe you made it this far despite being a [marginalized out-group]

                Ok makes sense but did SFA do that? If so, when?

              • James R Kirk@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                Your explanation didn’t explain what “forced inclusion” means and what makes it different from regular inclusion. Maybe you could give an example of each from Star Trek?