The U.S. job market turned weaker last month, dashing hopes for an economic rebound.

A report from the Labor Department on Friday shows employers cut 92,000 jobs in February, when economists had expected the U.S. would continue adding jobs, albeit at a sluggish pace. The unemployment rate inched up to 4.4%.

Job gains for December and January were also revised downward, with December now showing a net loss 17,000 jobs.

The weaker than expected jobs report comes as Americans are already anxious about the high cost of living. Those affordability concerns will likely be amplified as the war in Iran has triggered a sharp rise in energy prices. AAA reports the average price of gasoline jumped another 7 cents overnight, to $3.32 a gallon. That’s 21 cents higher than this time last year.

  • Qwel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    So, in order for the unexpected number to be caused by a Black Swan event, the event has to be unaccounted for in modelling. If the number has a 0.1% chance of happening but is caused by variables that were accounted for, it doesn’t count. Is this correct?

    And a number that had 50% chance of happening can also be caused by a BS event. Basically the status of BS event is unrelated to the probabilty of the resulting numbers.

    And now I’m not sure of what I should do with that concept

    I see how it could get used as a variant of “the future can never be determined with full certainty and therefore I can’t be blamed for anything”

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      So, in order for the unexpected number to be caused by a Black Swan event, the event has to be unaccounted for in modelling. If the number has a 0.1% chance of happening but is caused by variables that were accounted for, it doesn’t count. Is this correct?

      You’ve basically got it, yeah.

      Its… admittedly complex to grasp, or explain in detail without me getting a cup of coffee and then giving a whole ass intermediate/advanced level statistics crash course.

      The core idea is that… you are not as smart as you think you are, not matter how much your hedge fund or whatever pays you.

      Things can happen that you literally are not capable of conceiving as possible, untill they happen.

      Thats a real Black Swan.

      But, thats not the same things as things you can concieve of, but think are unlikely, think can be easily hedged against, or aren’t worth hedging against.

      Thats just your own hubris.

      There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy back-tested, multi-variable stochastic model.

      And now with BlackRock utterly collapsing, we’re all about to find out our pensions and 401ks were … essentially mostly theoretical.

      • Sonicdemon86@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        It is like when sg1 went back in time because a solar flair intercepted them while they were traveling.