My home page is blank. My search engine is duckduck go.
I only have adblock and noscript.
I want firefox to not access google - ever. Right now it shows that it connects and maintains a connection permanently.
I find it infuritating actually.
My home page is blank. My search engine is duckduck go.
I only have adblock and noscript.
I want firefox to not access google - ever. Right now it shows that it connects and maintains a connection permanently.
I find it infuritating actually.
At your own risk, disable Safe Browsing. And add all Google domains to the blacklist of uBlock Origin. Or you can simply switch to LibreWolf and go on with your life.
Yes, Google Safe Browsing is probably the cause. Anyone curious can read more about it here, but that traffic at browser startup is probably going to Google’s Safe Browsing API servers.
I’ve disabled all of the safe browsing via about:config
still talks to google. weird. also it still keeps the connection open either for re-use or, dunno.
Hmm, I will try the LibreWolf - will also try disabling safe browsing.
Thanks for the info!
Btw, disabling Safe Browsing didn’t do the trick.
I did download LibreWolf. I have bad news - it does exactly the same thing.
Sigh. Maybe if you are using it you should profile it on osx or windows - or ntop linux I think will do it.
[https://librewolf.net/installation/debian/]
I don’t want to have to “taint” my distro install by adding a repo. I want it to be available from my distro’s official repo.
Nothing tainted about it. It’s actually one of the easiest ways to get a package you want/need. I appreciate anyone who maintains my precious librewolf package.
Adding a repo is not “tainting” an install. Adding a package to the official repo is not the responsibility of the devs but of Debian’s package maintainers.
https://wiki.debian.org/DontBreakDebian
Anyway, the bottom line is that if LibreWolf folks want more people to use their software, then one of them ought to become a Debian package maintainer for that package.
The only relevant part in that link is this:
And you should be safe about this.
As I was saying, the devs are not responsible for including the package to the official repo. You are owed nothing and have plenty of other options to install it.
As for your bottom line remember the contributors are working on it for free, they are not selling anything. So they are not running after more users. It’s good as it is, non technical people can use flatpack or AppImage and technical people can add a repo without issues.
And someday someone could add it to the official repo, it could be you.
are you sure its librewolf that makes the call of whats in your distros official repo?
Of course not; it’s the distro that makes the call. But I want the Librewolf folks to make the effort to get accepted by the distro.
You could try the AppImage or the flatpak.
You’re going to miss out on great software with that approach. Even for packages that have a Debian apt version, I find it much safer to get it from the maintainers official repos. Get the same version as the apt package if you must.
LibreWolf can’t be a convenient daily driver. Need tweaks and tweaking default settings may reduce privacy and security slightly.
Yes, I’ve tried it multiple times, but, apart of the so-called “privacy features”, I can’t find a single reason to use it instead of regular Firefox. Well, I suppose that if you’re really paranoid, or hate every single decision Mozilla makes with the force of a thousand suns, then it can be appealing.
Thats because it is so close to Firefox to not even be distinct, but the privacy settings are useful anyway. I’ve used it as a daily driver for a long time and have not yet found it lacking.
Because it’s supposed to be Firefox but private. That’s literally the only distinction.