Cross posted here as it was highlighted that the individual is a lead Lemmy developer, raising serious concerns about the direction of Lemmy, a leading Fediverse platform, and the impact on future user adoption.

Hi

There have been some rather concerning actions taken by an admin of the !privacy@lemmy.ml community, dessalines@lemmy.ml. Based on recent moderation decisions and a complete lack of communication, it seems like their account may have been compromised, or even more concerning if these actions are deliberate.

  1. Erroneous Rule 4 Enforcement, First Instance: a guide posted to !privacy@lemmy.ml, despite receiving many positive votes and comments, was removed under Rule 4:

If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered

However, this post was a guide and not a question, so Rule 4 does not apply. Attempts were made to reach out for clarification but there has been no response, despite their account showing recent activity.

  1. Erroneous Rule 4 Enforcement, Second Instance: an on-topic informational video also posted to !privacy@lemmy.ml, despite also receiving many positive votes, was again removed under Rule 4. This post was again not asking a question, so again Rule 4 does not apply. Again, no explanation has been given.

  2. User Bans in Completely Unrelated Communities: user bans of over a month have been applied for not only !privacy@lemmy.ml but several completely unrelated communities:

This is especially concerning given that the above posts have no relation to these communities, and no recent activity has been made in any of them, meaning none of their rules could have been broken. Moreover, a public track record of positive contributions across Lemmy has been established, with many positive votes and comments received over a sustained period. Given all of this, the bans appear to be highly disproportionate, only adding to the growing concerns around moderation practices.

  1. Repost with Disclaimer Removed: a repost of the guide, despite a disclaimer explaining the original removal appears to be in error and that attempts to contact the admin have failed, despite again receiving many positive votes and constructive comments, was once again removed. Again, no explanation has been given.

Given all of this, it’s hard to avoid the conclusion that something is not right. Mistakes in moderation happen but the complete lack of communication, the disproportionate actions, and the ongoing bans from unrelated communities raise serious concerns. It seems as though the account is most likely compromised, or even more concerning if these actions are deliberate.

Has anyone else experienced similar issues with this admin, or does anyone have more insight into what might be happening?

TL;DR: Admin dessalines@lemmy.ml of !privacy@lemmy.ml appears to be making seriously concerning moderation decisions, including erroneous enforcement of Rule 4 in at least two separate instances, failing to respond to messages, and applying user bans in completely unrelated communities despite a long track record of positive contributions across Lemmy. This has led to speculation that their account is likely compromised, or even more concerning if these actions are deliberate.

Any thoughts or similar experiences would be appreciated.

Cross post with https://lemmy.world/post/43944126

      • rglullis@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Any community that talks about moderation issues. Preferably one that is closer to the users of lemmy.ml.

        This is not the place for this. It achieves nothing and gives newcomers the impression that this type of petty drama is an integral part of the Fediverse.

          • rglullis@communick.news
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            dessalines power tripped his own software.

            AFAIK, he does not have any power over the other instances and communities that are not hosted over on lemmy.ml?

            Uhhhh, are you aware how federated networks initialize?

            Not interested in being baited into a pointless discussion today, sorry.

            • _‌_反いじめ戦隊@ani.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              he does not have any power

              He does: it’s called association by usage. Guns don’t kill people, but their usage is to. lemmy threads with other threadiverse software, but installing lemmy means supporting an authoritarian. Merchants of Death and all that.

              Not interested in being baited into a pointless discussion today, sorry.

              Then don’t bother commenting on what little history you know🙃

              • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                , but installing lemmy means supporting an authoritarian

                Have you ever transported yourself in a Ford, or derived, vehicle?

              • rglullis@communick.news
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                installing lemmy means supporting an authoritarian

                Non sequitur. The software is free to use, free to redistribute and does not come with any obligation to support the ideologies of the developers. If that was the case, everyone using Linux desktops should be associated with Richard Stallman (author of the GNU project), which is on record defending Epstein by arguing that minors can consent to sexual relationships in exchange with money.

                • _‌_反いじめ戦隊@ani.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  So, you’ve never dealt with association with killers before?

                  everyone using Linux desktops should be associated with Richard Stallman (author of the GNU project), which is on record defending Epstein by arguing that minors can consent to sexual relationships in exchange with money.

                  Funny you mention this. Why did Linus Torvalds then disassociated with Vladimir Putin’s genocide?

                  • rglullis@communick.news
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    Why did Linus Torvalds then disassociated

                    Absense of evidence is not evidence of absence.

                    You are failing at this most basic test of logic, this is not what I want to get dragged down into a pointless discussion with you. Enjoy the block, and have a good rest of the weekend.