• cynar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 hours ago

    It needs a trifecta. Protests, Politics, and “Persuasion”.

    The protests give weight to the political group. They also give cover and a place to organise for harder actions.

    The political elements act to focus the will of the protestors, and provide guidance to the agitators.

    The “Persuasion” group add teeth to the political demands. They also act to defend the protestors, when the government gets aggressive.

    The 3 need to work together to achieve major changes. “The Troubles”, in northern island are a good example. The IRA didn’t achieve much/anything practical. What they did was force the UK government to sit down and negotiate in (vaguely) good faith. The protests and marches acted to show large scale support for the changes.

    Against an intelligent, aware government, the need for violence is implicit, rather than explicit. It’s a lot better to engage early and diffuse political hot potatoes. Unfortunately, the US government doesn’t seem like they will take the hints.

    The marches should be used to crystallise the other 2 requirements. A political agency, to act as a voice. As well as those willing to go further, to act as the muscle.