• DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    10 hours ago

    “Under fire”? Man that sounds serious. What are they actually firing at him, though? Like how is he suffering or being penalized by being “under fire”?

    • slemptastrophe@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It’s like when a corporation gets “SLAMMED” for some anti-social act, or policy. It means theyvare being criticized for it, but the accountability ends there.

    • some_designer_dude@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It doesn’t mean anything. These headlines might as well read, “quell your rage, educated masses: the bad people are finally getting the negative attention they deserve, so put down your pitchforks…”

      It’s a slow drip of hope that consequences are just around the corner. It keeps uprisings at bay. Until decades later people realize, “wait a minute… how’s this guy running for President? Wasn’t he ‘under fire’ for some shit not long ago?”