Daniel Tocci’s attorney had previously argued that the case should be dismissed because “all the evidence" stemmed from his Capitol siege case.
Daniel Tocci’s attorney had previously argued that the case should be dismissed because “all the evidence" stemmed from his Capitol siege case.
Hasn’t it? Because I seem to remember reading this headline on previous occasions, more than once.
Probably because previous stories were reporting the arrest, trial, conviction, etc. This is the sentencing. You’d have to check the previous stories to be sure.
Maybe it’s a bit of both?