White House officials are bracing for oil prices to surge past the $150-a-barrel mark as the Iran war stretches into its second month and the Strait of Hormuz remains largely closed, according to a new report.

In recent weeks, the average cost of a barrel of crude has hovered around $100, a figure that the Trump administration now sees as the new “baseline,” though a potential spike to $200 hasn’t been ruled out, a source familiar with the matter told Politico.

As a result, officials have entered “all hands on deck” mode, urgently evaluating options to tame soaring oil prices — which pushed gas above $4 a gallon this week and risks inflating costs across the broader economy.

  • FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Do you sometimes find yourself needing to buy things? Those need to be shipped to the places where you buy them. And the parts they’re made of need to be shipped to the places where they’re manufactured. You pay for all that when you buy them.

    • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Wow, I wonder if I’ll have more or less money to buy things that cost more if I’m not spending money on gas? 🤔

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        You’ll have the same amount of money, but things will cost more so you won’t be able to buy as much.

        This is some very basic economics.

        • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I don’t know how else to explain that by taking public transit I’m not paying for gasoline to power a personal car, meaning money I would have spent on gasoline from the gas station is money I now have for more expensive goods I can’t avoid buying, like food. People who aren’t taking public transit are paying for more expensive shit and also more expensive gasoline.

          This is basic math.

          • FaceDeer@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            And I don’t know how else to explain that your laughter is misplaced because you’re going to suffer right along with everyone else anyway.

            You’re saving a bit on gas by taking public transit. Whee, bully for you. Lots of people save a bit by doing little things to save money. I keep the thermostat in my house lower than most people do because I like wearing fluffy housecoats instead, but I’m not laughing. It doesn’t protect you when everything gets more expensive.

            • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 hours ago

              They’re laughing at you/us because they don’t pay for a car, which means either they don’t have a job or they live in a very population dense metropolitan area where the cost of living offsets the money they save by not having/needing a car. So yes in those areas you can have a car, but parking is severely limited, you pay for a parking space, parking just about anywhere else gets you towed, so most people just take the bus/train. If the bus/train is late, you might lose your job, but there are other jobs and your boss is probably late sometimes because they also can’t afford a car. They get accustomed to this life and shame people who have cars because they envy their freedom, and their lower cost of living. Misery loves company, after all.

              But they are right in that they don’t have to pay for gas, or car insurance, or car maintenance. They still pay it in higher rent, utilities, and goods and services in the area. But they consider those costs sunk and therefore, do not factor them in. They think they’re winning, when really, at best, they’re no better than we are, and in some ways they are, but in many ways they’re just as bad if not worse. But they’re also shaming us for living the way we live, so that’s worse too.

          • Fondots@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            The goods you buy are transported to the stores you buy them from with fossil fuels

            The public transit is, in all likelihood, powered by fossil fuels, which may make prices go up

            Even if it’s an electric train, or being delivered by electric trucks, etc. there’s a good chance that the electricity is being generated by fossil fuels

            But even if it’s not and it’s coming from solar, hydro, nuclear, etc. those are still likely reliant in some way on fossil fuels some extent for vehicles used to provide maintenance, deliver new/replacement parts, etc. and probably for backup generators to make sure critical systems stay powered in the event of an emergency shutdown, so the price of the electricity is going to go up.

            You’re really not as insulated from this as you seem to think, basically our whole economy is based around fossil fuels, when the price of them goes up, the price of literally everything else does as well. Sure, you’re not outright paying directly for fuel, but everything else you are paying for is going to go up before too long.