Namecalling is really only worthwhile if it bothers the accused or their supporters. ‘MAGA Mike’ is really just… a tame description. No reason to use it.
More left and center leaning religious people are anti-MAGA than they are anti-theocracy. A lot of them think the Bible was a big inspiration for the Constitution while being anti-MAGA; so meet them where they are I guess…
You’re over thinking who the target audience is. It’s the low information/ lower intelligent people this will resonate with. You want to keep things simple. Most Americans wouldn’t understand anything you are talking about, these same people believe a god lives in the clouds. It’s important to stay on their level.
I’m sorry, that’s weak as hell. He’s worse than MAGA. He’s a theocrat. But I guess that’s not alliterative so we can’t possibly say what he really is.
Namecalling is really only worthwhile if it bothers the accused or their supporters. ‘MAGA Mike’ is really just… a tame description. No reason to use it.
That’s why I’ll never stop calling McConnell ‘Moscow Mitch’ or ‘Moscow’s Bitch’
Though the latter works for Mike too.
MAGAT Mike?
Easy to switch to, even if it’s still tame.
More left and center leaning religious people are anti-MAGA than they are anti-theocracy. A lot of them think the Bible was a big inspiration for the Constitution while being anti-MAGA; so meet them where they are I guess…
You’re over thinking who the target audience is. It’s the low information/ lower intelligent people this will resonate with. You want to keep things simple. Most Americans wouldn’t understand anything you are talking about, these same people believe a god lives in the clouds. It’s important to stay on their level.
Yes, all those low-information voters who care about the newly elected Speaker of the House.