• HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Are humanoid robots the answer for a lot of use cases?

    The resson industrial robots are the shapes they are is because it fits the job. A stamping machine foes not need a face or legs. It feels like humanoid designs are taking that process in reverse- come up with the design as a general model, then hammer it into a use case.

    Even if the premise is the classic “robot butler/caretaker”, will the best design necessarily be humanoid? Two legs and feet make self-stabilizing harder than 3 or 4 wheels, maybe a single main arm and a set of multiple clamps would be better than two symnetric hands for fidgety movements.

    I also feel like the near future is fleets of narrowly scoped devices for resilience and better task fit. If the Roomba is broken, but the Kitchen Delivery Drone still works, it won’t derail your dinner plans the way an all-in-one Roise the Robot Maid failing would. The Roomba can also stay 10cm tall to fit under the furniture even if the KDD needs a refrigerated compartment big enough to hold a turkey.

    And let’s get ahead of it: no pain emulators. We know how it turned out for the Kaylon.

    • Elise@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      The stamp machine has one single job. A humanoid robot can interface with anything a human can. It’s backward compatible too.

      • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s backward compatible too.

        I feel like this is the biggest selling point for humanoid robots. A roomba may in theory be efficient, but it still can’t do stairs.

        • Elise@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          It could even ride a bicycle. So they could join the Dutch military haha.