The feds will still go after it as an illegal drug when presented as recreational and the will keep the stigma going on forever. Furthermore it will keep a lot of talented people out of good job opportunities for smoking a joint after work instead of having a glass of wine.

  • CaptObvious@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’ll get rescheduled when Big Pharma comes up with a potion that does a better job and that they can sell for $10k per dose. So long as cannabis works better than anything they can monetize, they’ll fight to keep it illegal. And they have very deep pockets.

    • Nougat@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The only reason cannabis is Schedule I is to “felonize” people who are more likely to vote against Republicans, so their right to vote can be taken away. Pharmceutical companies would frankly love for it to be descheduled, so they can research and develop it for prescription uses.

    • zacher_glachl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      A better job at what, getting you high? Pretty sure they already have that, and while it doesn’t net them 10k per dose the Sacklers would have liked that very much no doubt.

        • jasory@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I think people need to actually research THC and cannabinoids. The handful of studies that have been done on them show that it’s no better than OTC medication in all but the very rarest cases.

          Medical marijuana is a complete hoax, it was always about making money and getting high.

            • jasory@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Nope. It’s been 2-3 years, but I read every single research paper on the subject.

              You’re confusing blog posts with actual academic papers. Just a heads up the the effects of medicines are no where near as clearcut as people think. Cannabiniods have fairly weak evidence for efficacy.

              Imagine thinking that journalists have the capacity to analyze papers. Try getting a degree or atleast taking some classes on biostatistics.