• SirStumps@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Without proof there is no victim. It’s just a person speaking about another person. I don’t go around sentencing random people with unconfirmed charges. Innocent until proven guilty.

    I don’t give a shit about this man in the slightest. I didn’t even know who the CEO was until today. However, people spouting a tweet like it’s hard evidence is so stupid it really makes you wonder how someone can be that dumb.

    If it did happen then it’s terrible but without proof there isn’t any way to prove it.

    • Dr. Dabbles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well for sure what he needs is you here defending him. Nice work. All the concern you express is for him, none for her. And it’s not “a tweet”, it’s multiple threads over 2 years. Strange you’re trivializing the allegations like that. It’s surprising to me when weirdos choose to defend against rape allegations, more so when it’s incest and child related. And for some reason there’s always the tech fans doing it. Normally I’d wonder why, but I’m sure you have your legitimate reasons to pretend a little girl wasn’t raped by an older brother.

      • SirStumps@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Whatever you need to quantify your reasoning is fine. I do apologize I called you stupid and it was uncalled for. I am sure that you believe what you say to be right and true or justice. I do not know where you are from but where I live you are innocent until proven guilty. Until actual evidence in produced the man in question is innocent. If one day evidence is provided that isn’t just hearsay then I will change my mind. I do not defend anyone because there is no one to defend.

        • Dr. Dabbles@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I bet you’ll be first on the ground defending him if evidence came to light, but I do wonder, what evidence would you find acceptable? What evidence would you consider credible enough for you to accept someone has alleged multiple forms of abuse from an elder sibling during childhood?

          My guess is literally nothing.

          • SirStumps@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            To simple test really, you find the closest river you tie him to a chair and you dunk him if he drowns he was innocent and if he lives he was guilty. However, if you drowns the sister is put to the flame.