• BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ultimately, they have no obligation to provide you something of value for free, and given that you do apparently use YouTube, they are objectively providing you something of value. They’re completely within their rights to not do that.

    • drkt@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ll gloss over that you either missed my point or ignored it; I don’t use YouTube because it’s too shit, actually.

      I don’t pay for any Google services, not that I’m using any with any consistency anymore, for the same reason that I don’t use them anymore. Google cannot be trusted to provide a good service, paying costumer or not. If you punish me for using the free product, why would I ever trust you? Steam doesn’t slap me across the face at every chance it gets when I don’t spend money on their store for a long period of time, yet I have no issue paying for the games I do want to play despite piracy being completely risk-free by comparison.

      • candybrie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you aren’t getting paid for your content, they’d probably be glad to not have to host it anymore. Anyone with content where it’s worth them hosting it is getting paid.