• vxx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    No, you said this:

    I dont think anyone shpuld be arrested for speach. But i can understand germanys reasons to do such things

    completely ignoring the article because you’ve already made up your mind the second you read “speech”, suggesting Germany would arrest people for some harmless stuff.

    Are you in favour of not getting investigated after you’ve threatened someone?

    • muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      I still havnt seen these threats. And germany arrested 6million people for some harmless stuff so wouldnt put it past them.

      • vxx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You’re making a fool of yourself just because you would never admit to a mistake.

        This got to be the most stupid comment I’ve read the entire year.

          • vxx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The mistake of only reading the headline and also misinterpreting it completely, making assumptions in your extremist worldview.

            • muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              1 year ago

              Ok can you pleasd try being a little less hostile so we can have a productive discussion. Difference in interpretation is called an opinion we are all entitled to one. I didnt just read the headline. And thinking that we shouldnt arrest people based on speach is an extremist world view didnt knwo that.

              From my interpretation they celebrated a terrorist attack. Wrong yes, moraly corrupt yes, should it be illegal no. If u think celebrating a terrorist attack should be illegal then then the very top of the arrest list would be the US government. And hate speach which nobody can actualy provide to me so god knows what they actualy said.

                • muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Classic case of whataboutism (its a atrategy used by narcecists to distract and deflect). And not sure how thats hostile it a good joke.

                  • Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Ah yes presenting evidence for your double Standards Is whataboutism. Sure.

                    I’m just going to block you now. Because you have nothing of value to say, you just ramble.

                    Maybe get help for that Copeium addiction.