• ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    For sure! I know a few pitties, too, and they are good dogs. It’s very much a “law of large numbers” type of thing. Likely more aggressive on average, but the answer is probably not breed bans and more likely restrictions on who can breed dogs (and maybe who can own certain dogs).

    • EatYouWell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      The problem is that if the city can’t even budget enough to feed these dogs, they’re certainly not going to be able to budget enforcing the breeding/ownership laws.

      • ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        That is fair. Could be subsidized by the cost of breeding licenses, but the administrative burden would be greater. I feel like the breed ban administration would be difficult as well - since pitbulls aren’t really a breed, what constitutes one? Is it only American Pitbull Terriers? Because most pitbulls aren’t APTs, but some mix of bully breeds. Who would make that determination in each individual case? It’s a tough issue all around.