I’m trying to resolve an argument.

EDIT: Yes, you can. But you can’t digest it. The only edible parts of a tree are some specific types of tree bark. Thanks, everyone!

    • ThreeHalflings@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Wood is just less than half cellulose by weight, so wood must be safe to easy.

      This mercury sandwich is just less than half bread by weight, so it must be safe to eat.

      • DessertStorms@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        still at least part of wood though, a part that’s edible, as far as I’m aware, mercury has none of those (adding the bread, and extra ingredient, is cheating).

        • ThreeHalflings@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          If something is part edible and part not, then it really depends on the nature of that not edible bit. If it’s inert, then great. If it’s not, then you could be kinda fucked.

          The fact that something is 45% edible says precisely nothing about whether or not it is edible.

          • DessertStorms@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I never said otherwise (nor argued that all wood was edible in its entirety), but your comparison was still a bad one.

            • ThreeHalflings@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You think a mercury sandwich isn’t a realistic representation of wood.

              Wow, you know, after careful consideration I think you may be right. Thanks for your wisdom. Truly enlightening.

              I’ll go eat some wood.