• Grimy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    You are missing his point. Is Disney going after the one who is selling the copy online, or are they going after Adobe?

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      In that analogy, openai is the one selling it, because their the ones using it to prop up their product.

      I didn’t think I needed to explicitly state that, but well, here we are.

      Have a nice life tho. I’m over accounts that stop replying to one thread of replies and then just go and reply to one of my other comments asking me to explain what I’ve already told them.

      Waaaay easier to just never see replies from that account

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Some of us have to work for a living, I can’t reply to every comment the moment it comes in and it seems rude to break the chaine.

        In his analogy, openais product was the tool. You can do the same with both img gen and Photoshop, and neither of these prop up their product by implying it’s easy to copyright infringe. That’s why I said you were missing his point but you do you buddy.