EU antitrust chief to Tim Cook: Apple must allow third-party app stores::The European Union’s Margrethe Vestager has met with leaders of US Big Tech firms to discuss their operations in the EU, and with Apple’s Tim Cook concentrated on the App Store and Apple Music.

  • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    The EU is literally the only major entity actually trying at this point. Thank you!

      • Petter1@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yea, but they only copy EU, which does the hard work. So I bet nobody would do anything, if EU wouldn’t.

  • seedd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    90
    ·
    8 months ago

    The only third party store that should be allowed is fdroid (or fios ig), everything else that is sideloaded is either malware or pirated apps

      • poopkins@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        This community encourages such incredible depth and discourse. Keep it up, folks!

        Edit: whoops, posted this on the wrong community. Yay, piracy!

      • seedd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Ofc i do, i won’t have jackshit in my jellyfin without it. But apps, nah…cracked apps are full of shit

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      And as they are opened up major companies can go to them for better deals allowing for the free market to work as intended.

      • seedd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 months ago

        Android has sideloading, does google take a lower cut than apple? No. Even with sideloading allowed, 99% people don’t use it, majority android users probably don’t even know about this thing called apks.

        • Squizzy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          The option is there. Windows has an open platform, do you buy all your software and games through Microsoft or do you use the developer’s website and third party launchers that have to compete on experience pricing?

          Whether they are used or not doesn’t matter, the first step is opening it up. And there are multiple apps that I get through alternative stores than the play store and it benefits the developer more so I don’t really care what the other 99% are up to.

          • seedd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Thats because windows didn’t have a store before 8, so everybody is used to downloading exe. And even today there isn’t much on windows store. And i am not agaisnt sideloading, but there should be some safety measures too (maybe thats why windows needs antivirus?) to idiot proof sideloading. F droid is a great example of what sideloading should be.

            • Squizzy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              So in the case that you are arguing there would be safeguards…you could continue to use the app store unhindered.

              People should be free to install what they want, if they end up with malware that is their problem I’m not giving 30% to Apple because fuckwits can’t excercise caution and educate themselves.

              F droid is exactly what we are arguing for in this case, literally the exact thing this side of the argument is trying to make Apple facilitate.

              • Spotlight7573@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                If poor security practices only affected those responsible, I might agree with you on that front. As shown from the 23andMe “breach” and also how botnets are formed, individuals’ poor security practices can affect many more people than just themselves. I feel we have a responsibility to protect people from doing stupid things, even if that might not be the most free thing to do.

            • Petter1@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              If you look at macOS, you see that even apps not installed through the app store need to be signed from apple in order to not trigger a big ass warning. Apple on it’s own proofs that the security aspect is not an argument. Edit: I think windows does this as well to some degree

          • Spotlight7573@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Software on Windows is still a bit of a mess compared to most other platforms though. The fact that it is normalized to download and install things from the various developer websites, without much verification and without permissions/restrictions on what the apps can do is not a plus in my mind. winget has been helpful in managing the installation and updating of things though.

            Everyone having their own launcher is also not great, especially since they are not all created equal with respect to features, stability, and resource consumption. Games have had this problem for some time with EA, Ubisoft, Epic, etc having their own launchers. As like what happened to games, I don’t think it will necessarily end up with more freedom to buy the apps from the store you want, but rather you’ll be forced to download a store/launcher based on the whims of the app publisher. Some may publish to multiple stores but I don’t expect all to.

            If the mandate to open the platform up to more stores came with some kind of requirement that apps be available across multiple stores so that the stores actually had to be competitive on their own features, not app exclusivity, I would be more inclined to support having more stores.

            • Squizzy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              You can’t mandate that until there are multiple storefronts. That should be the next step.

              As for everyone making you use their own app store, that will go down just as well as people who make me install their app, I won’t.

              Multiple storefronts doesn’t mean taking a single app away from the app store. It means you can subscribe to Spotify for 30% less by using an alternative. It means developer’s can argue for a larger cut of their revenue simply by having alternatives.

              As for individual game launchers, steam is far and away the most popular and well liked and it, with the exception of a few of their own titles, a third party launcher.

              Competition is good for the consumer.

    • Petter1@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yea, because with cydia zebra and sileo, you can only install malware /s

  • Mereo@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    109
    ·
    8 months ago

    No, thank you. I will continue to use Apple’s App Store. What made me switch to the iPhone was the fact that I could trust the apps in the App Store. I knew there was no chance of downloading malware. It’s a liberating experience.

    I don’t want it to be like Android.

    • MagneticFusion@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      just don’t participate. nobody is asking you to use other app stores. this is only a good thing.

      • Drusenija@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        8 months ago

        Nobody is asking you yet. Once it becomes an option I guarantee some apps will decide that they’d prefer to use a third party store over the App Store and if that happens to be an app you use then you are essentially being asked to use other app stores.

        This isn’t advocating for or against it, I’m just saying that if you think that this is purely additive and those who don’t want it can just not interact with it and get the same experience they have today then you’re being naive.

        Regardless, it’s going to be interesting to watch. Smaller niche apps that don’t need discoverability will probably benefit, since if you need a niche app for something you’re probably prepared to put the effort into using a third party store. Large apps I suspect will go a hybrid model if they do anything at all (use both the App Store and a third party store, with the third party store having a lower price, although I guarantee it won’t be 30% less), and stuff in between will likely stay on the App Store unless there’s enough of a network effect to get enough users to a third party store to make it worth switching.

        • Ross_audio@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          App developers are unlikely to take themselves off the Apple store it would remove themselves from a huge portion of the market they developed an iOS app for.

          But they will find third party stores taking a smaller cut than Apple does. They will pass on some of that saving to the customer or find a way to encourage you not to use the Apple store if they get to keep a higher cut. Like earlier updates and feature releases.

          That’s the point. Apple currently has a controlling monopoly on a market. Competition will lower prices for the consumer.

          Anti-trust laws exist to do exactly this.

          All it will take is a trustworthy company to launch a 3rd party app store. Then maybe you won’t mind.

          Some companies like Cisco might just launch a store instead of putting their apps through Apple as they would like higher security than the App store provides.

          Apple will also be forced into a competition to be the most secure app store too.

          The likelihood is they’ll just play with the margins and do what’s necessary to keep a near monopoly but the possibility of competition is useful in itself. At the moment there isn’t even that.

          • Drusenija@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            All it will take is a trustworthy company to launch a 3rd party app store.

            This really is the key to this being successful I think. Right now a lot of the nervousness around opening iOS is because of the fact that people (rightly or wrongly) trust and have a relationship with Apple.

            The people who are concerned about third party app stores really are worried about the implication of having to trust a new third party with their device, their payment details, their personal info, etc.

            Put someone reputable behind an alternative and it becomes an easier sell.

        • Madis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          Well, do you see it happening on Android for any major app except Fortnite?

          • Drusenija@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            That’s fair, and I admit it’s one possible outcome of all this. I just think that if the EU mandates that both Apple and Google have to support them that it’s going to shift the needle on it as the alternative infrastructure will be properly supported on every major platform. As you get that infrastructure, get payment providers in place to drive it all, the friction of switching will drop, which makes it a more appealing option for developers.

      • exothermic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        Using the same logic: just don’t participate by not purchasing an apple product. There are alternatives out there, buy an android. I enjoy my walled garden, it’s a feature that I pay a premium for.

        Enter everyone to tell me why I’m wrong and/or stupid (see replies below).

        • MagneticFusion@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          8 months ago

          Walled garden is not a feature. It’s called a limitation. Apple fanboys once again simping for a company that does not give a fuck about them

        • Darthjaffacake@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 months ago

          I got given an iPhone, owning a branded product isn’t as much of a choice as you’d think. And it really doesn’t change anything for you since you’d have to actively go out of your way normally to use a 3rd party app store. The walled garden is still there unless you go exploring.

          • exothermic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            The barrier to entry for an android is incredibly low. You could trade in your iPhone to get an android. There is choice in the market place, exercise your own freedom and switch to android

            • Darthjaffacake@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              I really get it man, I was originally not gonna take the offer (it was a take it or leave it, not a situation I could sell it) since I love all the open systems android uses. Unfortunately, I’ve been buying androids for the vast majority of my life and they just haven’t been that usable for me. It’s not like I’m giving money to apple anyway since I’m not buying anything from them and I would really benefit from 3rd party apps since I used to use them on a daily basis on my android.

        • Stoneykins [any]@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I won’t call you names but this literally doesn’t make any sense to me. In no way would the apple app store be affected, your walled garden is safe. To (attempt to) extend the metaphor, this is like giving you the option to take walks in other gardens, but your walled garden is still where you left it, gate locked.

    • ashok36@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’ve been on android for 10+ years and never downloaded malware.

      Don’t try to download cracked apps and you’ll be fine.

      • viking@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        There have been some genuine apps that then download malware in the background, often after months.

        But the same thing exists on the apple store.

    • Adanisi@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      No freedom to choose

      “Liberating”

      Uh huh. Try thinking about other people. Just because you don’t want freedom doesn’t mean other people don’t deserve it. You can always just choose to stick to Apple’s crap if you really want to. But right now, people can’t choose what they want because gaining control over their own damn device is so difficult by design. That’s the point.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      So do. Just because you only want one shop doesn’t mean other should have to shop there.

      Try thinking of other people and how you might differ from them.

    • Petter1@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Lol, there IS some malware in the App Store and there is not more malware in the playstore.

      Only difference, on android it is easy to sideload, for example, emulators. And that there exists an alternative opensource app store (Fdroid)

    • Spotlight7573@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’d be more worried about every company trying to force their users into using their own store to access their apps.

    • muh_entitlement@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      All these corporations just getting greedy. There will be a pirated app store and I will be the first to endorse it!!