• LWD@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    puts on tin foil hat

    https://www.wired.com/2012/05/google-wifi-fcc-investigation/

    Wait, I don’t need a tin foil hat for this… It was national news

    At the point it becomes impossible to buy hardware that doesn’t have a Wi-Fi antenna in it, I’ll get really worried regardless. Tricking a device into connecting to the right wifi network already is so wild, and people shouldn’t have to do that. I’m smart enough to. Not everybody is. Not everybody has the money for an extra router.

    • Treczoks@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Not everybody has the money for an extra router.

      No need for an extra router. I just put those device into the “has no internet access” group. It is one of those “Parental Control” things. Every device inside the net can see and talk to it, but itself cannot talk to anything outside.

      • LWD@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Which is understandable… To me, anyway. Until the router needs to be reset, or something else happens to it.

        Come to think of it, I’m not sure if my router hardware actually supports this possibility. I’ve got a PiHole, but I’m also not the average person I play telephone tech support for.

        • Treczoks@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Until the router needs to be reset, or something else happens to it.

          That’s what “configuration backups” are for. You’ve got some, don’t you?