Several parents in an Iowa town where a deadly school shooting took place earlier this month told school officials on Monday they want more preventative measures and transparency as the school board plans for students’ return.

Their comments came during a Perry school board meeting, the day after the death of Principal Dan Marburger, who was critically injured in the shooting.

Grace Castro criticized the school district’s policies, saying that “lives were lost due to our lack of preventative measures.” She suggested the installation of metal detectors at schools’ entrances and a temporary remote learning option at the same time, and enforcement of a clear-bag policy as “the absolute least you can do.”

Her comments echoed what many other many other parents — including some of the victims’ families — have been saying on the Perry Facebook page since the district first announced its reopening plan last week.

  • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    It really is that simple. Guns are far better killing machines vs any other method you can come up with. Countries that ban them do not have the same rates of shootings and when they do have them are a lot less deadly. Sure someone could get an ax but it is far easier to deal with a guy with an ax vs your precious AR-15.

    Blaming it on the lack of welfare is misdirection.

    The Constitution does not need to be amended, it just has to be read. Are you in a well-regulated militia? No? You don’t get a gun. Go join up the National Guard if you want one.

    And if you think your shotgun is go to stop a dictator you will have to excuse.me while I laugh too hard to type.

    • GooseFinger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      8 months ago

      “Guns are far better killing machines vs any other method you can come up with.”

      Murder is murder. Banning guns doesn’t get rid of violent people, so assuming nothing else changes, we’d at best have 5 dead children instead of 8 or something. Sure it’s an improvement, but not a solution. I don’t feel that’s with it given the tradeoffs.

      “Countries that ban them do not have the same rates of shootings and when they do have them are a lot less deadly.”

      I’m sorry, but no shit. “Country that bans cars sees no more deaths by car accidents.”

      “Blaming it on the lack of welfare is misdirection.”

      I’m not blaming it on lack of welfare, I’m mostly blaming it on our decreased quality of life. Since you’re ignoring that mass shootings basically didn’t exist 60 years ago when Americans had comparatively unfettered access to guns, then look at any poor country today and their violent crime rates. When moral, legal avenues for leading a fruitful and happy life are unobtainable, then people will resort to illegal means to make that happen. This is nothing new.

      “The Constitution does not need to be amended, it just has to be read. Are you in a well-regulated militia? No? You don’t get a gun. Go join up the National Guard if you want one.”

      Well-regulated meant well armed and functioning, and the National Guard is a branch of the military, which is literally what a militia isn’t. Sounds like you need to read it.

      "And if you think your shotgun is go to stop a dictator you will have to excuse.me while I laugh too hard to type. "

      What makes you think that dictator will be on your side? If you think our current political climate is bad, itll pale in comparison to the one your kids will grow up in if Trump wins. Roll over and let your kids suffer if that’s what you want, I’d rather fight so they don’t have to.

      Gentle reminder that poor rice and goat farmers have won almost every conflict against our military the last 60 years. Regardless, if our military ever goes whole hog on us like you’re suggesting and starts bombing your neighborhood, I’ll be sure to message you to ask if you’re still licking their boots. Chances are, you probably will.