• Masimo, the company that sued Apple over patent infringement, has unveiled its own blood oxygen monitoring smartwatch called the Masimo Freedom.
  • The Masimo Freedom is a health-focused device that can track blood oxygen levels, hydration index, respiration rate, pulse rate variability, pulse rate, steps, and detect falls.
  • The smartwatch is currently in prototype stage and will be available for sale later this year at a price of $999.

Archive link: https://archive.ph/aOUXX

    • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      10 months ago

      All of them. Every cheaper alternative is just a crappier product that cheaper because it’s simply not as good.

          • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            There’s been a Garmin app store for twice as long as Apple has been making watches.

            https://apps.garmin.com/en-US/

            It’s not at all a different product. It’s a direct competitor who makes a superior product.

            Again – I’ve had a smart watch that does all the shit apple watch does, for half a decade before apple even thought about it. And mine can go a month without charging.

            • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              10 months ago

              It’s a direct competitor who makes a superior product.

              Define superior. Only Apple makes Smartwatch SoCs with any kind of decent performance, other manufacturers like Qualcomm don’t put a lot of effort into the market segment and just put an old CPU core in a low power package and call it a day. It’s simply not profitable enough for them.

              • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                I don’t give a shit about any of that. It’s what the watch DOES, and Garmin does WAY more, for WAY longer.

                • thecrotch@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Garmin does not do way more. Most of their “apps” are just replacement watch faces. Garmin doesn’t even try to compete on features, their selling points are battery life, price, and integration with other Garmin fitness accessories. Apple/Google/Samsung watches are so capable they’re basically tiny phones.

          • thecrotch@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            He’s full of shit, and the people upvoting him don’t know anything about Garmin watches. Garmin doesn’t compete with apple. They don’t want to compete with apple. Garmin doesn’t take the kitchen sink approach that apple/Google/Samsung do. They focus on fitness and battery life, they’re competing with Fitbit. This liar is pulling the old “I like it, therefore it’s the best at everything” trope. He’s a child. Ignore him.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Like the thousand dollar basic monitor stand?

        Or comparing similarly specced macs vs PCs (I bet that’s why they moved away from x86 again, because it was too obvious how overpriced they were when the specs could be compared 1:1).

        • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          The thousand dollar monitor stand is not a consumer product and simply sold separately because not a lot of people are going to need it. The monitor it’s meant for is actually a lot cheaper than comparable monitors.

          Or comparing similarly specced macs vs PCs

          In the x86 era similarly specced PCs had similar prices or were even more expensive. The thing about Mac’s is that while you can get a PC that has some better specs for less, you couldn’t get anything that matched all the specs. It may have had a faster CPU, but would come in a crappy plastic case, weigh a ton and run out of battery in 30 seconds. Or it ran forever on a single charge but had a CPU that was slow as molasses.

          (I bet that’s why they moved away from x86 again, because it was too obvious how overpriced they were when the specs could be compared 1:1).

          No, it’s because x86 is an overcomplicated mess with terrible performance/watt. x86 CPUs run hot, drain your battery and still don’t perform great. Apple’s M series SoC’s are amazing. A clean, modern ISA, high IPC, low power usage, low heat. It doesn’t matter if my MacBook Pro (M1 Max )runs on battery or wall power, it’s always blazing fast. It has insane battery life, does not get hot and is completely silent.

          • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            I was referring to the desktop space. Apple is a lot more competitive in the laptop space (unless you’re a gamer), but their desktop specs always made me laugh at the price they ask for it. Granted, I haven’t looked recently, but any time I’ve looked in the past, their price seems about 1k too high for what they are offering.

            But yeah, x86 laptops are generally a shitshow. I had a decent personal one, though that was used more like a very portable desktop than a true laptop. That one just stopped charging one day (though its timing was impeccable because I was already in the process of moving my files to a new desktop I had just built, just had to pull the drives out to get the rest of it). And a cheap one I threw Linux on for school that did the job. But my first work laptop at my current job was garbage and the current one is relatively better, but also has a bunch of issues, enough that I don’t think very highly of HP even ignoring their printer bs.

            • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              10 months ago

              I was referring to the desktop space.

              Is that still even a thing? Between hybrid working and flex desking, who still uses desktop PC’s?