The White House statement comes after a week of frantic negotiations in the Senate.

President Joe Biden on Friday urged Congress to pass a bipartisan bill to address the immigration crisis at the nation’s southern border, saying he would shut down the border the day the bill became law.

“What’s been negotiated would — if passed into law — be the toughest and fairest set of reforms to secure the border we’ve ever had in our country,” Biden said in a statement. “It would give me, as President, a new emergency authority to shut down the border when it becomes overwhelmed. And if given that authority, I would use it the day I sign the bill into law.”

Biden’s Friday evening statement resembles a ramping up in rhetoric for the administration, placing the president philosophically in the camp arguing that the border may hit a point where closure is needed. The White House’s decision to have Biden weigh in also speaks to the delicate nature of the dealmaking, and the urgency facing his administration to take action on the border — particularly during an election year, when Republicans have used the issue to rally their base.

The president is also daring Republicans to reject the deal as it faces a make-or-break moment amid GOP fissures.

  • Bye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Can someone explain to me why the border shouldn’t be closed except to legal travel?

    Because it sounds to me like illegal travel SHOULD be stopped. People immigrating illegally are working for super low wages, increasing supply of labor and therefore lowering demand. It’s bad for workers. I know people say “Americans won’t do those jobs” but that’s because they are paying nothing since they can get highly desperate exploitable people. Labor should be on the side of restricted immigration.

    Note I’m not talking about asylum, but the USA shouldn’t be the only place people go for asylum. It’s my impression that most immigrants are economic anyways.

    • TheChurn@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      The border is already closed to illegal travel, that’s why such travel is illegal.

      The border is not impenetrable - it is over a thousand miles of mostly difficult terrain - and enforcing entry requirements is difficult for those reasons.

      The single most effective way to reduce illegal immigration is to punish businesses for employing illegal immigrants. As with everything else, as long as a market exists then there will be an economic incentive to break the law. This is true for drugs, prostitution, Russian oil, etc.

      The federal government essentially enables the employment of migrants because many industries, particularly food harvesting and processing, could not operate without this labor. The consequence of the choice to not punish these companies is more migrants seeking the same economic opportunity.

      Fix the problem at that end and illegal border crossings will drop dramatically.

      • ramble81@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I agree with everything you said and that still begs the question: What does “close the border” even mean then in this context? It’s just a pointless platitude.

        • Quadhammer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          In a nutshell they’ve let themselves become a wedge issue because they’re dumb and easily manipulated

    • Diotima@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago
      1. Because “closing the border” is a nonsense statement that doesn’t account for the reality of the border abd its size. Thousands of miles of border means it is nearly impossible to patrol even a small fraction of it.

      2. People working for super low wages is a product of policy and exploitation. Making it easy and legal to immigrate for work is the right answer, as is enforcing labor law.

      • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Closing the border is part of the verbiage of the proposed immigration bill. For instance, a closing would take effect if there are 8,500 migrant encounters in a single day.

        • Diotima@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          We can close official crossings as much as we like, but it will do little to stop people immigrating. I’m guessing that this is targeted at southern crossings, too, as I doubt the govt is seriously considering turning people away in airports or up north.

          • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            I’ve read what insiders say is in the compromise, but can’t say for sure. But, apparently after a certain amount of daily encounters, the border patrol shuts down the border and removes immigrants and deports them. No, I don’t think the Canadian border or airline traffic is accounted for, which is kind of stupid.

            • Diotima@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Or legal crossings, which remain the easiest way to enter and stay. Enter the US for a vacation, simply… fail to go home. That neatly avoids the whole sneaking in issue entirely.

              I can’t say I’m surprised at this, given that Biden has never been particularly pro-immigration beyond lip service. I am, however, disappointed.

    • Kaboom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      There is no good reason except to create an underclass that provdes cheap labor. You know, like in 1860.