• toasteecup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    9 months ago

    You’re welcome to provide evidence to the contrary but his presidency was pretty strong indications. Look at what his supreme court picks did.

    • AndOfTheSevenSeas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      36
      ·
      9 months ago

      “His presidency” is not his cult, and “indications” are not evidence. Roe v. Wade was a Supreme Court ruling, originally and now, not legislation. The fear-mongering lies you mention are not Supreme Court rulings. Having been in the blue collar field for as long as I have, I have known a significant amount of people who you’d say fit his cult, and not one of them supports any of the insane bullshit you’re spewing.

      • toasteecup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Did I even once say cult? No. OP did. I’m attempting to have a good faith discussion with you while you’re doing nothing but insulting me. Good day to you.

        • EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Folks really enjoy putting the rhetoric of the parent post or OP into the mouths of anyone in the thread or comments, it’s absolutely wild.

      • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Roe repeal was a direct result of his administration appointing hard right wing justices. Acting like he had no hand in it is absurd. And your colleagues might not directly support these policies but they’ll get them anyway if they continue to vote against their own interests. Conservatives are always shocked when they’re punished by policies they didn’t expect to apply to them.