• MeanEYE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    There was GPS signal, it’s just by design that chips are not allowed to lock at above certain speed to prevent military use. But even if there’s no signal, mobile phone will try to find tower. If it doesn’t find one it will try increasing transmission power.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      But even if there’s no signal, mobile phone will try to find tower. If it doesn’t find one it will try increasing transmission power.

      Thus draining the phone’s battery much faster.

      Same thing happens if you are camping in a remote location with weak or non-existent coverage.

      • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yup. Although it’s been a while since I found a place without mobile signal for camping. This planet is getting crowded.

    • spongebue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      What? Every smartphone I can remember owning has gotten a GPS signal if I hold it up to the window. Plenty of planes have GPS on board too. If there is a speed lockout, a 737 isn’t enough to break that threshold.

      • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Speed limit is indeed above speed that 737 can fly (see addendum), but it’s not only reason why GPS sometimes doesn’t lock. On the plane your phone doesn’t get assisted GPS, where rough location calculation is based on ground data like WIFI networks and GSM towers, so time to first fix takes significantly longer because your phone only has access to L1 frequencies. Since it takes a while, 30s for entire satellite message to be transmitted, it’s coordinates and the like, and there’s no help from ground stations for crude calculation combined with speed of the plane it all ends up contributing to a significantly longer time to first fix or perhaps even problematic fix in the first place.

        So all in all, speed contributes to the problem. Yes signal was present at all times. And no, speed is not the sole factor but contributes a lot. GPS chips have improved quite a bit over the time so some old devices will definitely have a problem finding location on plane. Newer ones won’t, especially considering they have access to other networks like Galileo, GLONASS and BeiDou.

        All GPS receivers capable of functioning above 60,000 ft (18 km) above sea level and 1,000 kn (500 m/s; 2,000 km/h; 1,000 mph), or designed or modified for use with unmanned missiles and aircraft, are classified as munitions (weapons)—which means they require State Department export licenses.[126] This rule applies even to otherwise purely civilian units that only receive the L1 frequency and the C/A (Coarse/Acquisition) code.

        Edit: What airplanes have on board, is access to different frequency which your device doesn’t. It’s not comparable.

      • Psythik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Next time you’re on a flight, download a GPS speedometer app and launch it right before takeoff. You’ll notice that it’ll accurately measure the plane’s speed up to around 500 MPH, before it suddenly stops giving you a speed readout.

        Like the other person said, this is to prevent your average dude building a guided missile using an old phone they have lying around.

        • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          It’s a built-in security of the protocol. For accurate speed measurement device would need access to L2 frequencies, which carry encrypted data used for additional corrections, faster calculations, atmospheric conditions, etc. One can certainly get a location tracked through phone, but it’s not solely though GPS, it’s most likely combination of other positioning systems.

          • deur@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Probably would just use an IMU exactly as the plane itself already does for its own navigation.

            They get a lock on the ground, synchronize the IMU with the Earth’s orbit, and they keep track of where they’ve moved from the origin, supplemented by GPS.

      • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        You are welcome. Although, like I said in other reply, speed is not the only limiting factor. It just makes it harder to find location. There are number of other things.