I’d asked about using a VPS to get better routing to my homelab in this post: https://lemmy.world/post/1424540

I’ve narrowed down my problem- if i use a subdomain in my caddyfile, performance is 1/3 or worse compared to just the root.

example.com {reverse_proxy 192.168.1.57}

will saturate my gigabit lan connection at 980ish. On a 5gUW connection i get my advertised 50 mbit or more

librespeed.example.com {reverse_proxy 192.168.1.57}

I get 220-250 megabits on my internal lan. The same 5gUW connection will only get 7 or 8 mbit.

It’s strange to me that everything seems to work just fine, but it’s just slow. Anyone got any ideas?

  • Lasso1971@thelemmy.clubEnglish
    5·
    1 year ago

    That’s a crazy issue to have discovered. Maybe you could try a different reverse proxy like nginx to narrow down potential causes for the issue

    • bigredgiraffe@lemmy.worldEnglish
      2·
      1 year ago

      Yeah this smells like a bug in Caddy or something. I agree to try nginx or something else to see if it’s Caddy or if it’s something with the configuration of the host. The only thing I could think of is if caddy isn’t caching DNS responses and maybe is getting rate limited so it appears slower while it’s waiting on the DNS request but I am shooting in the dark as I haven’t spent much time with caddy.

  • PriorProject@lemmy.worldEnglish
    2·
    1 year ago

    I can’t remember if it’s enabled by default or not, but it’s easy enough to enable pprof and get a helpful performance profile from /debug/pprof. See https://caddy.community/t/hangs-on-reload/12010/18 for an example.

    I’ve found that even being unfamiliar with the codebase, it’s often pretty easy to identify what part of the call stack is being slow and file a very useful performance but report in GitHub. Check out the profile and see if it leads to any obvious conclusions about why domains are so much slower. There may be some function that’s trivial to cache the results of that brings things back to the expected performance.

    • lemming741@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
      4·
      1 year ago

      I tried to dig into that but couldn’t come up with a good test. But if NAT hairpinning wasn’t working right, I’d be limited to my ISPs 50Mbit, right? I could get 200+ Mbit on wifi. I also tested this from work (50 Mbit sym fiber) and subdomains always were slower. I figured out today it’s HTTP/3 causing my problems. I don’t know if I care to troubleshoot anymore since it’s working great with http 1 & 2.