It’s an older article, but the point stands!

  • zoe@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    i want to build a fuck_planes community, but i doubt anyone will get…on board. cars are less of an issue (just demand smaller cars, high wheelers need to be abolished, luckely they aren’t common in europe). planes are the bigger threat for now. we need to get our priorities straight.

    • klieg2323@lemmy.piperservers.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      For short haul flights where a train is preferable, or private iets, absolutely. However airplanes are still the most efficient way to travel long distances. Abolishing airplanes altogether is one of the least thought out takes I’ve ever heard.

      • zoe@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Abolishing airplanes altogether is one of the least thought out takes I’ve ever heard.

        yea, not altogether. i commented on this before https://lemm.ee/comment/2119584 : air travel should be limited only to transcontinental travel or cross country in Asia’s case (since its a bunch of isles at that point) efficient? ofc, moneywise and timewise. environemently friendly? dont think so. thoses tons of burned kerosene would translate into tons of co2 released, in a single flight. no wonder our globe feels like a microwaved cookware. fast and affordable have a cost.

        i drew the analogy from the game warcraft: u only need to pay for a zeppelin when u want to reach somewhere that couldn’t be accessed by land, in a map. we just live in a bigger map.

      • MyNameIsIgglePiggle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I think planes are fine, they just need to be solar and wind powered.

        Solar to get them in the air, and then wind you are going fast enough the wind turbine on the top provides limitless electricity to power the plane forward.

        • pingveno@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          wind you are going fast enough the wind turbine on the top provides limitless electricity to power the plane forward

          You’re arguing for a perpetual motion engine, which doesn’t exist. That energy has to come from somewhere, and it’s increased drag. The aircraft are designed with a smooth, sleek, efficient body. A wind turbine is the opposite.

        • zeekaran@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Solar to get planes in the air, please go read a book about energy densities and learn why that’s impossible.