• 2 Posts
  • 573 Comments
Joined 2 年前
cake
Cake day: 2023年6月12日

help-circle




  • How would a general strike be neutral or positive for the economy?

    General strikes have to involve a meaningful percentage of the working population and are only supposed to end when the demands are met. The people on strike stop working, reduce spending as much as possible and stop paying tax.

    It’s hard to imagine a scenario where that wouldn’t affect it massively in a negative way, so I’m genuinely curious as to what you think would happen in that scenario

    Edit: I’m not sure I understand why this has been met with downvotes and no comment? I don’t see how I’m saying anything false here

    Unless it’s a misunderstanding that I’m saying people should not do a general strike, which couldn’t be more wrong. Tbf I think Americans should have started one long before this point.

    Hurting the economy in a sustained manner is the mechanism through which general strikes are an effective tool of the working class










  • Nope sadly, AI needs GPUs and it makes up the bulk of sales of these chips now.

    It would be suicide for any of the companies that could make these processors to not go after the biggest market. The result of a company not doing that would be watching all their competitors grow and advance their products whilst their company’s value drops and products stagnate, possibly to a point that recovery to competitiveness would be hard if not impossible.