1·
17 days agoIt says “found guilty”. It says nothing about his punishment or rehabilitation, and with how prison conditions are, I very much suspect that jail time will not be rehabilitation.
Mainly on @Aatube@kbin.melroy.org . This account to moderate subs while providing actual reasons for deletion! A feature mbin appears to lack?
- 3 Posts
- 33 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
Cake day: May 23rd, 2025
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Your submission in “Starting tomorrow, New York will increase penalties for serious traffic violations” was removed as schadenfreude (rule a)1).
one moderator of !UpliftingNews@lemmy.world here! is it fine if i make a post (and maybe even edit into the itemized-rules post) directing schadenfreuders to your commag?
I think the uplifting part of this is supposed to be that more people are going for more non-perishable foods that’d last longer and give families more means to survive than measly plastic-wrapped bars. It’s… a stretch, but I don’t think we should remove it. Feel free to downvote the post if you don’t think it’s a good fit for our commag.
Removed: I don’t see how this is supposed to be uplifting
Your submission in “US news outlets refuse to sign new Pentagon rules to report only official information” was removed as schadenfreude or toxic politics .
It is not.
Your submission in “Still No Kings: Millions to Protest Trump On Saturday” was removed as toxic politics (rule b).
Your submission in “DHS agents retreat as Chicago cops refuse to shield them from swarming protesters” was removed as schadenfreude.
I am once once again asking for your bars—what should be the bar/criteria for removal?
I think we should ask for and respect the decision of the community instead of imposing our own judgements. And of course, we still remove personal attacks (not that your admittedly negative-ish comment counted as one /gen).
What would be your criteria for removing a post as “orphan crushing machine”? (Also, political posts meeting the “More clarification” paragraph at https://lemmy.world/post/30918729 are already removed, the most recent but weak example being the post on Sanders having his tour go to NYC for a Mamdani town hall.) (Separate threads, separate comments.)
What would be your criteria for removing a comment?
I would’ve removed the post if I saw it before it gained traction. The thing with these things is people usually upvote them because they see it at !all instead of thinking it fits !upliftingnews, and too much of these posts can dilute the quality of our community and drive away users who wanted the specific thing we’re looking for.
Your submission in “Sexual predator Noel Clarke loses libel case against The Guardian” was removed as not uplifting.
Your submission in “LA Ice protests spurred US military to identify ‘hotels to avoid’ due to ‘harassment’” was removed as not sure if schadenfreude but definitely not uplifting.
you know what?
you’ve just darn saved this post from removal, my friend.
This might break rule b) and I don’t find it uplifting (a bit orphancrushingmachine when you think about it, even) but I don’t think there’s much use in deleting this at this point.
Your submission in “Police seize supercars worth more than £6m in crackdown on antisocial driving in London” was removed as i don’t see what’s uplifting here, sorry.
Your submission in “Horror moment superyacht bursts into flames off Ibiza coast before sinking” was removed as schadenfreude. Note that this is your second time breaking the rule in three days.
Your submission in “Ex-South Korean president found guilty of insurrection over martial law order” was removed for schadenfreude (rule a)1). I would suggest posting to !politicaloptimism@piefed.social…