![](https://media.kbin.social/media/1a/a8/1aa85fd85ade3e2a34ac74ad4e7a8c412abb1c7fa22fee23ff2205e0490d25f2.png)
![](https://beehaw.org/pictrs/image/c0e83ceb-b7e5-41b4-9b76-bfd152dd8d00.png)
That’s some straight up gaslighting shit. If they can figure out to charge it, they can print it on a bill.
I’m back on my bullshit.
That’s some straight up gaslighting shit. If they can figure out to charge it, they can print it on a bill.
Serious question: Since it’s a federated system that is open-source, what do their political views have to do with supporting the platform? Even if they decide to become Neo-Nazis and change it, the rest of use can continue to use the work they’ve made thus far and keep it like it is or improve on it. Our use of it doesn’t support their political aspirations either aside from their beliefs in federated social media.
those are the admins of one instance. if you don’t like them, you can join another or create your own
self-promoting /c/autism!
while i don’t necessarily disagree that porn can destroy the meaning of sex and wreck one’s brain, i really would prefer the state stay out of my business. i think a better approach would be to provide education on how porn affects us and avenues to seek help should someone fall into an addiction. however, getting the state involved on what people can and cannot say is too much control for my comfort.
I just want to point out that a group of people are gathering to ensure that they don’t agree to follow a person that they don’t have any obligation to follow anyway.