All those examples are capitalism and changes absolutely nothing for humanity except the shape of the slave driver. Your mistake is thinking of commodity production and wage labor as unchanging, eternal states of being which comes from the bourgeois economic ideology taught to you, a notion Marx already destroyed. There was a “before” capitalist production and there will be an “after”
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Bourgeois party does bourgeois things, more news at 11.
It’s never been more obvious that this is all a puppet show. And they hate that it’s obvious. Look at how fast the two “opposing sides” (lol) join hands when it comes to something that has to do with war or crushing labor strikes. The rest of the time it’s terminal gridlock, posturing, and ostentatious displays of feigned aggression. And it all just so happens to line up perfectly with the will of the bourgeoisie.
What if the state of the French police is but a reflection of the profound malaise engulfing the rule of law in the country as a whole?
What if it’s the opposite? The “rule of law” is nothing but the collective will of the ruling class and the police is the enforcement organ of that class, so it makes no sense to say that increased utilization of police is a “malaise” of the “rule of law”. Actually, it sounds like it’s working as intended. The real reason- the bourgeoisie response to the intensification of class struggle- is totally absent from the article. Instead it focuses on some mystical “abandonment” of “liberal values” as if “right wing” ideas suddenly achieved a will of their own and “infected” the police departments and functionaries of the state. Someone reading this must come away more confused than they were before they read it.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Indeed, his associates say Mr. Singham has long admired Maoism, the Communist ideology that gave rise to modern China.
Replying with an article that refutes this claim is not on-topic?
There are several articles there. The first one is about Lebanon. Like I said, you might have to scroll to the one about China if the hash link isn’t taking you there
deleted by creator