That’s a whole other can of worms obviously, but I get your point. What about a company subscription to Spotify or some such?
That’s a whole other can of worms obviously, but I get your point. What about a company subscription to Spotify or some such?
Thought experiment: What if it an extremely intelligent person memorised every Metallica song on a free Spotify account, down to every small detail. Later that person writes a new song, it’s heavily inspired by Metallica, it sounds like them, you might even mistake it for them except for the vocals, but the lyrics are new, the chords are new, etc. Did that person then violate copyright, even though it’s a completely new song?
I know the AI techbros are just scraping every datapoint they can get their grubby little hands on, but it makes me think.
Imagine for a sec that all that AI buzz and hype leads to something that is indistinguishable from that extremely intelligent person (however unlikely).
We’re not anywhere close to a scenario like that, but at what point is a regular artist that spent their youth listening to Britney Spears violating copyright law, philosophically speaking, when they decide they want to make music like that?
Penny for your thoughts.
No it’s not. More than one side can be monstrous in a conflict. “Yeah well but they did X so it’s okay that we did Y” is bible level reasoning aka no reasoning and pretty much what is causing the whole thing anyway.
About 15k euro or so. I could go to a school program to learn how to code without my financial situation declining because of medical costs i have for a chronic condition.
The question is really why does she have to trick you into doing chores? :')
Don’t use it as a bible but as a tool with suggestions.
Lemmy don’t like LLM’s