![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/db7182d9-181a-45e1-b0aa-6768f144911a.jpeg)
Ten thousand premeditated murders via deliberate inaction is not balanced out by a million visas granted. The severity of the crime gives it more weight. A life extinguished does not equal a life improved somewhat.
Ten thousand premeditated murders via deliberate inaction is not balanced out by a million visas granted. The severity of the crime gives it more weight. A life extinguished does not equal a life improved somewhat.
He also ignored the AIDS epidemic on purpose, leaving thousands to die simply because he didn’t like gay people.
Funny. Tech bros insisted that this wouldn’t happen.
This is actually a lot of work put into a supposedly generic map.
Seriously, this is a major red flag. You aren’t entitled to breach your lovers privacy.
That said I haven’t read the article so maybe he’s a serial killer or some shit. (I’ve never even heard of the website in the screenshot.) Either way, don’t do that.
Why a shooter? Superheroes aren’t known for using guns, and tend to be bulletproof themselves. Did they just copy the current trend and apply a Marvel coat of paint? That’s stupid.
Thus proving her point.
Secondly, you’re literally asking for a final version of something without any sort of human testing involved. Can you name a single medical device, ever, which has had exactly 1 version, no updates, and went through 0 human trials before completion?
That’s what the animal trials were supposed to be for. You know what happened to them? They died. They didn’t even wait for the chip to be successful in apes before putting it in a human. If you don’t understand why that’s fucked up, I can’t help you.
Removed by mod
You haven’t been keeping up with the news have you? The chip malfunctioned, and Elon knew it was going to.
Because it kills everything you put it in? I don’t know how to tell you that you’re supposed to care about other people.
WHAT THE FUCK
This is gonna get worse
before it gets better.
Are we talking about the same thing? I replied to someone taking about OpenAI, not porn in general. The creation of porn without the consent of the people fed into the program is nothing short of an ethical nightmare, even in cases where said people are pornstars. You’re painting me as a repressive for shit I didn’t even say.
God forbid people have concerns about ethics.
See my other comment. I’ve also edited my original one for clarity.
My phrasing is not good, but my point is supposed to be that the idea of a female Pope isn’t so far fetched that “wokeness” is the only explanation for depicting one. The idea of Joanna is popular enough to be depicted in the works of art generative AI shamelessly plagiarized trains on, therefore it shouldn’t be a surprise.
I will edit my original comment to make this more clear.
Including a woman pope
A woman was pope.* Thanks Persona 5 for teaching me that.
Never go full Mel Gibson.
If you’re making your dungeons from scratch, try taking some design cues from a Zelda game. (Excluding the NES ones) In those games every room has an essential function necessary for progression, so none of your hard work will go unappreciated.