

Maybe I can build a bird feeder that is as tall as a skyscraper. 🤔/s


Maybe I can build a bird feeder that is as tall as a skyscraper. 🤔/s
I can’t read this because it’s not in code fencing /s


Liquid glass? Sounds hot. 🤡


A task that might have taken five hours assisted by AI, and perhaps ten hours without it, is now more commonly taking seven or eight hours, or even longer.
What kind of work do they do?
in my role as CEO of Carrington Labs, a provider of predictive-analytics risk models for lenders. My team has a sandbox where we create, deploy, and run AI-generated code without a human in the loop. We use them to extract useful features for model construction, a natural-selection approach to feature development.
I wonder what I have to imagine this is doing and how. How do they interface with the loop-without-a-human?
Either way, they do seem to have a (small, narrow) systematic test case and the product variance to be useful at least anecdotally/for a sample case.


A comment late in the thread says none of the LLMs even use the PR-suggested llms.txt.


I worked on and created a lot of things, but when thinking ‘cool’, the fractal rendering I did a long time ago popped into my mind as well. It just looks cool, interesting, has variance and experimentation, and is very visual.


You can just take the L and say you didn’t see that the function definition that was “added” was just “removed” at the top.
That’s not what happened though.
Changing the indent of the def changes the definition. That’s my whole argument.
I don’t get why you say “of course”, agreeing with my point, but then “it was only the indentation that was changed”.


What I wrote. I wouldn’t want to do AI Thursday and kinda malicious compliance for a prolonged time.


I see, thank you for the clarification. I was quite confused because it seemed to be missing, this one didn’t quite seem correct. If they never even pushed it as a MR then that makes more sense. Then the whole “hasn’t been merged yet” is missing that it hasn’t even been created.


I see, thank you for the clarification. I was quite confused because it seemed to be missing, this one didn’t quite seem correct. If they never even pushed it as a MR then that makes more sense. Then the whole “hasn’t been merged yet” is missing that it hasn’t even been created.


An indentation change is a definition code change. And as I pointed out, it’s a py file, and Python is an indent-significant language.
So you’re using [] as an alternative function call syntax to (), usable with nullable parameters?
What’s the alternative? let x = n is null ? null : math.sqrt(n);?
In principle, I like the idea. I wonder whether something with a question mark would make more sense, because I’m used to alternative null handling with question marks (C#, ??, ?.ToString(), etc). And I would want to see it in practice before coming to an early conclusion on whether to establish as a project principle or not.
math.sqrt?() may imply the function itself may be null. (? ) for math.sqrt(?n)? 🤔
I find [] problematic because it’s an index accessor. So it may be ambiguous between prop or field indexed access and method optional param calls. Dunno how that is in Dart specifically.


The issue, presumably the PR (linked at the top of the issue because of reference).
Look at the code change. It gets inputs and loops over them and seems to do an in-place fixup. But the code indent is wrong, and it even changed the function definition of the unrelated next function. In Python, the indent-logic-significance language.
I assume they briefly showed the code on stage. Even then it should have been obvious to any developer. py file, messy indent, changes unrelated function.
Please correct me if this is the wrong PR.


I would make Thursday AI day and do everything with AI. And Friday is recovery day, where I discard everything that didn’t work, and do what I want, to recover motivation for long-term sustainability.
I wonder if and when they would notice a productivity difference. I certainly couldn’t and wouldn’t be able to do that indefinitely.


Makes me think used tokens, which is very easy to fake.
If I were in a malicious environment, I’d be interested in gaming the system, excessively producing AI code even if I never use it.
On AniDB I can enter dd.MM.yyyy or yyyy-MM-dd (text input), which I like a lot. I often prefer reading and writing yyyy-MM-dd.
Some time ago I changed my Windows number format settings to show me yyyy-MM-dd formats. Unfortunately, that broke my webbrowsers date input / datepicker. :( So I had to go back to the standard culture format (de in my case).
The worst is when you work with dates and don’t know what is what, or when the behavior is unexpected.
Probably everyone knows about the Excel shitshow of implicitly converted values.
In SQL Server, what do you think 0000-00-00 is when converted to a date, explicitly or implicitly? Well, unfortunately, yyyyMMdd is a safer format than yyyy-MM-dd.
SET LANGUAGE 'us_english'
SELECT CONVERT(date, '2025-12-13')
--SELECT CONVERT(date, '2025-13-12') -- err
SELECT CONVERT(datetime, '2025-12-13 07:00:00')
--SELECT CONVERT(datetime, '2025-13-12 07:00:00') -- err
SET LANGUAGE 'Deutsch'
SELECT CONVERT(date, '2025-12-13')
--SELECT CONVERT(date, '2025-13-12') --err
--SELECT CONVERT(datetime, '2025-12-13 07:00:00') --err !!
SELECT CONVERT(datetime, '2025-13-12 07:00:00')
No, yyyy-dd-MM is not a common or valid German date format. That’s usually dd.MM.yyyy.
But worst of all, it changes behavior of the date parsing between date only and date + time types.


How does JPlus handle compile time null checks against Java library interfaces? Does it consider them all nullable and to be handled as nullable?
If nullability information is a type metadata extension for compile-time checking, does that inevitably break on library interfaces when I create both library and consuming app with JPlus?


I prefer this one from two months ago https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HkgV_-nJOuE


What kind of tech and project did or do you use it on?
I’m not saying you’re wrong, but would we even be seeing them when they exist? When I publish or update my personal projects as public GitHub repos nobody sees and nobody cares. I imagine it would be the same if I were using LLM.