She/Her - Was bullied off reddit by mean moderators, but it’s a corporation anyway - 🏳️‍⚧️omni, heart - Pro kindness|gressiveness, Anti cruelty|bullshit.

  • 7 Posts
  • 452 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: February 23rd, 2025

help-circle


  • I think we should find alternative ways, provided they don’t already exist, to ban predators and bad actors that doesn’t punish the entire userbase. Unfortunately, with initially ethical control comes state- and money- sponsored surveillance and oppression. It is seemingly impossible for the former to be free of the latter.

    We’re already bombarded by services requiring users give up their age in order to be placed in data farming and advertising categories, with some banning those who cannot be farmed. Hell, every social media provider’s user age limit is 13 as per the EU GDPR – regulators only need to increase that age to 15/16 if they’re uncomfortable with its current level.

    And no - I do not see a way to enforce age restriction without breaching basic rights to privacy. The only reason services demand your permission for cookies, device information, identifying data etc. is because the regulators mandate they cannot take your data without your permission. If they cannot find a way to sandbox the under-18 internet from the over-17 internet, then we should just keep the existing rules and expand support for victims. I dont believe there is an ethical solution for preventative measures.






  • Well, the enemy of authoritarian control and conquest is every member of the public (yes, even cis-het white men - they suffer even if they are on the authority’s side) not just African Americans, but I appreciate a middle finger to authorities. Some countries outright outlaw depictions of violence against authority figures like police officers. Everyone needs to learn that resisting cruelty is not only okay, it’s imperative.


  • I don’t recognise the state law as a righteous law anyway - there are more important laws than the opinionated statements of a few hundred aging or dead men. State law might govern the low-income population but it does not govern or define fact or reality, as reality is irrefutable.

    By labeling Palestine Action as a terrorist group, without delving into the broadness of their own definition, the government imply to the public that the group is cruel or manipulates using terror, which is false as they do not participate in cruelty.











  • In the UK the term is defined by the government as anyone who is deemed by the government a threat to the government or the people or someone’s property or the predominant local religion. But recently it’s been exclusively used for the first one. In this country state law is valued higher than corporate, moral, ethical and religious laws, so YMMV

    Introduction
    The Terrorism Act 2006 uses the definition of terrorism contained in the Terrorism Act 2000. Section 34 amends that definition slightly, to include specific types of actions against international governmental organisations, such as the UN. The definition in the Terrorism Act 2000 (as amended) states:
    
    1. (1) In this Act “terrorism” means the use or threat of action where:
    2. the action falls within subsection (2)
    3. the use or threat is designed to influence the government or an international governmental organisation or to intimidate the public or a section of the public
    4. the use or threat is made for the purpose of advancing a political, religious or ideological cause.  
    
    (2) Action falls within this subsection if it:
    
    1. involves serious violence against a person
    2. involves serious damage to property
    3. endangers a person’s life, other than that of the person committing the action
    4. creates a serious risk to the health or safety of the public or a section of the public
    5. is designed seriously to interfere with or seriously to disrupt an electronic system
    
    Section 1(3) to (5) goes on to expand on the effect and extent of this definition.
    

    Link


  • I highly recommend a Navidrome/Slskd/beets[lyrics]/Symfonium setup!

    I have a Proxmox container running: Navidrome, that serves music in a Library Folder (B); Slskd, that serves a SoulseekQT web UI and downloads to a Download Folder (A); and beetbox beets program with the lyrics plugin installed via pipx that has config parameters set so that I can manually run it, it’ll detect and allow me to identify songs downloaded to Folder A, inject synced lyrics, and move them to an organised folder structure in Folder B.

    • Navidrome doesn’t need organisation, I just do it to be neat.
    • beets uses MusicBrainz and another I believe for song/album ID, and lrclib for synced lyrics
    • I also have Lidarr set up to download from Soulseek with the Tubifarry plugin, get lyrics via lrclib and move to Folder B with the same structure as beets, but its metadata is heavily lacking and many images and artist song data is just nonexistent after about two months of “populating” (see below), so I recommend keeping the manual Soulseek/beets approach
    • Again I recommend ignoring Lidarr or maybe using it for a visual library without downloading, but there is a pro, now I’ve configured it - Lidarr doesn’t often automatically request and then organise music, but when it does, the music is exactly the quality I requested. So at least Tubifarry is solid.
    • You can use any Subsonic client but I find Symfonium to be incredible. Paying these devs is worth it!
    • slskd can be configured to run beets after download I believe, but I haven’t figured that out and don’t plan to, for want of less complexity.