Seriously… they could have at least mentioned her name in the title. The article is about her. Come on.
Seriously… they could have at least mentioned her name in the title. The article is about her. Come on.
The video is still up on twitter for me. Regardless, here’s the source from fox news.
https://youtu.be/eRBhzBd2afE?si=HWLxq4Qxl6i5tpiB&t=76
The bit in the twitter post ends at 2:36.
Calling him a narcissist isn’t really an insult either way. It’s just a fact about him. The dude only cares about himself.
It looks like the real benefit of the doubt is that he’s hopefully talking about laws on voter ID being fixed. Still, what the hell is a presidential candidate doing telling people they don’t need to vote anymore? Even with the benefit of the doubt, this shit is ominous.
Edit: to be clear, I don’t give him the benefit of the doubt. All I’m saying is if somebody wants to, this is the best they’re able to do. It’s also important to be aware of the context of the quote, even if you believe he means it in the worst way.
I’m unable to hear lock him up much at all. “Loh 'im uh!” is the closest I can get when forcing it… I’m just not hearing any Ks or Ps at the end of those words, no matter how hard I try.
The words “the Lord of the Rings trilogy.” are darker and lower than the rest of the text. Its definitely edited.
Eh, its just a community of people having fun and being themselves. I also think it’s weird, but it’s harmless, so who cares? I don’t have the self esteem to be so open about something that society at large finds weird af, so honestly, good for them.
AI art has a very real place in current society. It’s very useful, and is absolutely going to get better and become a normal part of the future. We’re not going to avoid it, so we should work on making AI less morally fucked. The technology isn’t the problem, the people behind it are. Rather than stealing art, the multi-million/billion-dollar companies behind these models need to pay artists for every single piece of art they use in their models.
Did you even read what I said? I agree with you there. But technically, and I’m only bringing this up because you the original commenter* originally did, it is an accusation.
*Edit: I thought you were the same person, but my point still stands.
This particular case is, technically, an accusation, though. Even if we’re all just about certain that it’s true.
“[It] sucks they’re banning…”
Probably autocorrect or something like that, it’s not that hard to figure out.
Oh, I know. But the original comment you responded to said “I respect people who have faith” which is why I brought it up. I also believe faith itself is dumb and have little respect for it.
Somebody needs to tell Trump that his religion expects him to follow the commandments, not break them. Bet he’ll feel real silly for mixing that up.
Why shouldn’t people who have a faith be respected?
Seems like I did. I don’t think I’d call realism a religion, though I don’t know much about the viewpoint. In what way is realism more harmful than other religions?
Nobody said anything about realism. Realism and religion are not the only two options.
Uh, no.
God’s vision for humanity
Translation:
Our cult leaders’ vision for humanity
Problem? I’d like to know what your raised skeletons are doing that makes them a positive on your community.