I mean usually yes, but in the history in question here is public and very easy to confirm.

It progresses logistically; eventually it’ll plateau and there’s no reason to believe that plateau will come after “can do everything a human can.”. See: https://www.promptlayer.com/research-papers/have-llms-hit-their-limit

If I’m not wrong that was the whole point of criminalizing weed.

You seem to have exactly zero idea what you’re talking about.

Latest addition to my list of horrible blasphemy that should not exist.

Technology has already given us plenty of ways to sustain a growing (at least until it tapers off on its own at ~10 bil) population without harming the planet too much. It’s the filthy rich preventing us from doing so.

Yes, that is the point I was trying to make.

I mean, Hitler took inspiration from Manifest Destiny and American actions in the early 20th century, so Americans at the time weren’t meaningfully distinguishable from Nazis on the atrocities front.

It’s a precise term with a very specific definition in international law,

It’s not, actually. At least not that I know of.

I’m counting from the early 2000s when the Israelis were still actually making plausible 2 state solution proposals, even if only rhetorically.

In that case you want the early 90s instead with the Oslo accords.

Since then there hasn’t even been even lip service, as far as I can tell.

There was one more farce after that, I think in 2014.

They always are. Freeing Palestinian hostages/detainees is pretty much at the top of any list of demands by Palestinian resistance organizations. By handing them over they can avoid making any other concessions during ceasefire negotiations and the like.

I get that to westerners “terrorist” is the worst label ever, but terrorism is weak sauce compared to the shit Israel gets up to. “Colonizers” would be a much more appropriate label.

*~60 years. That’s when settlement started.

Kill unrelated people and let them buy national property for pennies on the dollar?

I mean, the rule of law has clearly failed.

Isn’t 35000 people way too few for a big city in six years?

He didn’t directly murder people, but the ideas and beliefs he spread did. I mean, at the very least his Covid conspiracy theories were killing people.

So? What the hell is your point?

It’s 2025 why is the choice between Trump and Newsom already?