For me its not so much that, its moreso just that I am disgusted by those that claim to be virtuous and pretend to care. Most people only care about others socially, when those people are struggling they rarely help unless theres social consequences for not helping.
I just hate hypocrites
You are in this dream but we do not grant you the rank of happy. Please, take a seat.
Well yeah, one is a protected class. Definitely not the common man.
I agree, but conversely if they dont allow flags, presumably excluding the US flag, that makes this make a lot more sense. Given that its kash patel, expecting logical consistency is asking a bit much, but if no one else has any flags then that would be a decent defense.
Aight, thats on me i suppose. I figured my tone combined with the absurd reductionism of his statement wouldve indicated joking sarcasm, but I may have made an error in judgement. Ill add a /jk
It doesnt seem like it needs to be said that charity is good. But for one, the implication I was making was referring to child molestation, which is well documented amongst the group i refered to. Hence why I made a reductionist joke about the phrasing of their words.
For two, it would seem to me that the important thing there would be the charity, not specifically that it came from a catholic priest. Would that same charity from a local charity, organization, or individual not carry the same weight? Hence it seems quite pointless to bring up that priests do charity. So do a lot of other people. Its not their entire job either. The distinction lies in the fact that other charity groups arent known to engage in child molestation, nor have a systemic issues with covering up and protecting child molestors.
Dont know what ghana is like, but im sure this wont result in either a genocide or massive political violence
Well, I get along with my local catholic priest
My condolences
Edit:/jk, see below
Malicious ignornace is malicious. Hell, ignorance implies access to information and refusal to engage with it. Ignorance is malicious.
Not sure why people try to justify shitty people, just accept that theyre shitty and move on, no need for labels. Do you really need to know the difference between hitler and your local catholic priest, or do you need to know theyre both dangers to society and should be treated as such?
Ive been well aware every time ive been cheated on. Its almost like if you cant trust your partner, you shouldnt date them. If thats something that bothers you then dont engage with cheaters. And if you cant tell whether theyre a cheater, then you dont know them well enough to be dating.
When discussing things like this, i find it best to view it through the lens of ubi. AI is happening, theres no amount of online debating thats going to change that. So if you dont create an economic system where people dont have to work to survive, people arent going to survive in your system. Hence, they have a point. People that WANT to get into music always have that option, untied to economic success. People that only make music as a cash grab now no longer have that incentive, because they dont need to.
People having to work to survive is barbaric
All i want for christmas is central carolina
deleted by creator
Google is unusable these days even if they didnt. Im pretty sure that all the major search engines are colluding to reduce the quality of search results. My suspicion is that this is to make sharing information more difficult, and thereby aid the rise in fascism.
For fascist policies to survive education must die. I dont know what things look like overseas, but at least in the US the timing of the current regime and the collapse of the usability of google are just too coincedental.
Im not trying to argue here, but I am a little confused. The first section seems to be referring to medical care, in which case there would seem to be some distinction? I suspect the answer to my confusion lies in the second part, but im having difficulty parsing it at all. Is it a reaponse to the first part? A continuation? The modlog wont load on my app.
Again, i have no agenda here, im just confused and would like context to avoid potential future issues
Im not convinced. Trump has demonstrated time and time again he doesnt need to institute martial law to remain in power. All branches of goverment have capitulated to him and effectively given him the power of a king. I keep seeing “Trump wants violence so he can stay in power” and it really reads as “if you dont want fascism, make sure you roll over when confronted with it”
Dm: The rat takes the “help” action
Me: sheer horror
If it doesnt have to pay taxes its a religion i think
By chance, was the campaign setting based off a non-dnd fantasy novel? If so, I might’ve been your DM :)
scientology, which is widely believed to be a cult,
Homeopathy, which is objectively pseudo-science,
Obviously you get to choose your labels, but theres absolutely nothing wrong with being a tomboy and it certainly doesnt invalidate your identity, unless you feel it does. Some of the women i know and like the most are tomboys. I certainly dont view them as any less of a woman, although quite frankly i dont spend time thinking about peoples genders either.
Just do you! Being proud of who you are is great, but if you dont like who you are there are always options to change. If you had to describe how you want to be viewed, how would you go about it?