Ok? So what? You’re legally allowed to but don’t expect people to like your for it.

“ICE isn’t made up of illegal immigrants”

Yep, never said otherwise and I have literally zero idea how you’d ever take that from what I said, since it makes zero sense.

“ICE”

What are the two legal exceptions to due process exist?

Which ICE is then legally enforcing?

Do you consider yourself informed if you don’t know the applicable laws?

“What to do with ICE”

Yes, what should we do with them?

Yeah, like you said, that’s Ur-Fascism, aka an academic definition they came up with in the 90’s that can apply to a lot of things if you squint right.

The historical definition of Fascism is:

Fascism is not merely a system of government; it is a system of thought. For the Fascist, everything is in the State, and nothing human or spiritual exists, much less has value, outside the State. In this sense, Fascism is totalitarian.

For Fascism, the State is absolute, individuals and groups relative. Individuals and groups are admissible only in so far as they come within the State.

Regardless, what does this have to do with ICE deporting people illegally? Any country that deports illegals is fascist?

You mean civilian leadership vs military leadership?

FDR won WWII from a wheelchair, your comment makes no sense.

Just casually trashing the military and then being shocked when the military doesn’t support you.

Washington Post and a few others as well, yes.

I’m also struggling to see the issue:

“News organizations pushed back, and the policy was revised last week to say that members of the media were not required to submit their writings, but that U.S. military personnel could face “adverse consequences” if they make unauthorized disclosures to reporters. Reporters could then be viewed as security risks and have their access revoked“

The military is covered under UCMJ and yes, you CAN get in trouble for leaking information. That’s literally part of the reason you have a security clearance, because you are saying you’re trustworthy enough to not leak shit.

Nope, and you’re being wildly bad faith.

Here’s, let’s fix this:

• ICE aren’t illegal immigrants

• ICE is deporting illegal immigrants.

• Still waiting on you to demonstrate that you know enough basic civics to know what the two legal exceptions to due process are for deportations of illegal imnigrants. Who, as we’ve established, aren’t ICE.

“Illegal immigrants”

Correct, folks who break into the United States illegally?

And what SHOULD happen to people who break into other countries?

And?

Nothing I said is inconsistent?

What SHOULD the penalty be for people who broke into this country?

Nope, I was talking about illegal immigrants.

And the two LEGAL exceptions to due process.

What are they?

I haven’t change the subject once, nor am I saying ICE agents are illegal.

I’m talking about the folks who broke into the US illegally.

So again, what SHOULD happen to folks who break into this country?

Nope, literally never said that.

They’re here illegally. They’re illegal inmigrwnts.

“Everyone deserves”

Oh well, the law disagrees.

What are the two LEGAL exceptions to due process regarding deporting illegal immigrants?

And what SHOULD happen to people that break into another country, since you think deportation shouldn’t be it?

“Illegal”

Breaking into another country literally means you’re there illegally.

“Due process”

Cool, what are the two legal exceptions to due process? Which Trump is using? It’s not illegally, you just don’t agree with it.

Are you?

There are two legal exceptions to due process regarding deportations.

Obama used 1 method to deport 2,000,000+ illegals with no due process.

Trump is using both.

Nope but apparently a whole lot of folks here do.

Considering a bunch of people have said Yes, the death penalty? What should happen to “SS members”?

“ICE”

So ICE is executing millions of Jews? And sending people, who broke in, back home is the exact same?

So deporting people here illegally is the same as killing Jews?