Is that not what I said but less tongue-in-cheek?
Is that not what I said but less tongue-in-cheek?
I mean the point is: let’s not. War bad, mkay?
Listen, the Geneva convention only specifies what we can’t use on enemies, okay? As long as the targets are technically friendlies, it’s fair game!
I’m honestly not sure what you’re referring to. Is that a word they use a lot in their lyrics?
If you start it, just put a tag that the list is incomplete and the wiki crowd will finish it.
I think you were pretty obvious. Someone actually curious would have asked what it meant.
Not a fan of the 0.5-ply paper they have at work?
Yeah, about the same.
Just really want some symmetry violation and new physics. It’s getting stale in here.
This particular instance was certainly pretending to be ill-informed, so
You mean antepenultimate?
I like to make the joke whenever someone mentions a Russian doctor falling out of a window or something:
There’s defense and there’s defenestration.
Gloam/gloaming
The onset of twilight/becoming gloomy
Feel like tenebrous being on a list of obscure words is tenuous, but maybe I just have esoteric interests.
I had a look to see if I could find a full list but sadly not. However most Wikipedia entries for the individual novels include a section called, “The unfamiliar word,” if you want to find more.
Be the change you want to see in the world.
The significance here is the recent supreme court ruling that presidents have presumptive immunity for things they do officially while president, supposedly so they aren’t worried by a silly thing like the law when they’re trying to “be bold” or whatever. “Officially” is left very loosely defined, making almost any act potentially official and therefore immune.
Smith’s claim here is that the actions trump took around the 2020 election were not official acts of a president, but were fundamentally acts of a private citizen, and therefore not immune.