Sound more like a cleric kind of thing.

Also, dnd 2024 calls their dice roll a d20 Test.

When the military unit gets a small task to proove, they are ready for the main quest.

• scroll snapping
• unit tests
• vulnerability
• fastboot
• root access
• abstraction level
• unity framework

Mindflayers are definitly evil (from humanoid perstective) because of their species. They eat and bread brains. And they are interesting.

Clerics don’t need to choose.

Horny Bard: “I do the Lobster”

Zealot Barbarian: “I die”

If I can get wish, I will get wish.

We missed you

Well, of course it depends on the type of game and context, it just sounds a bit like an uninteresting tool, to just have a just invincible NPCs. I think special weaknesses make every NPC more interesting. Give the NPC a weakness (eg. Superman hs cryptonite or Lord Voldemord has Horcruxes).

It shouldn’t be invisibile in the first place.

I use the onednd inspiration gained from nat 1 and only lasting a day.

Was propapbly an emberassed employee paying it out of his own pocket, just pretending his company would even care a tiny bit.

That is exactly the reason I allways play songle Ability characters. I just dont have room for ASI. All the int increase on my wizard comes from half feats.

In addition to what others say, it is a bit over the top to tripple the jump distance, when other effects in the game (jump, monks) can only double the distance.