The presidential race has never been a meritocracy

What does that have to do with the article?

deleted by creator

Hamas is the ruling, elected authority of Gaza. And even before them, other Palestinian officials have rejected multiple peace deals. That doesn’t mean all Palestinians are culpable, the same way not all Israelis are responsible for Netanyahu’s actions.

Its is a ‘both sides’ issue when the Palestinian side has rejected every peace deal, commits terrorist attacks, and calls for the genocide of Jews. Nobody looks good in this conflict.

Why is everyone so black and white on this issue? Israel has a right to exist. Palestine has a right to exist. It shouldn’t be hard to understand.

Those countries are capitalist. Research the Nordic Model.

This joke is so old, time since epoch was negative when it was made

Damn that’s sad. War is hell.

Yeah that’s a bluff. Google searches surely make up a huge portion of their traffic.

A “US-American” if you need to be very clear. But most people just say “American”.

It is shit, Austin

The Julia and Mandelbrot sets always get me. That such a complex structure could arise from such simple rules. Here’s a brilliant explanation I found years back: https://www.karlsims.com/julia.html

Wait let’s hear him out

Yep. “A dozen of people came forward calling him a creep but we couldn’t technically prove SA” is cold comfort

That was true at one point, but reddit has had personalized rankings for a while now. See: https://www.reddit.com/r/changelog/comments/7hkvjn/what_we_think_about_when_we_think_about_ranking

But your point stands; reddit’s earlier ranking methodology was obviously pretty good since it made the site so popular.

Thanks that makes sense. I get why some people are against it, but ranking on your engagement can be super useful imo. Like if I comment on a couple niche communities a lot, I don’t want those to be drowned out by the much larger communities.

“Let’s dispel with this fiction that Christie doesn’t know what he’s doing!”