Not enough X’s in that name.

F12 should open the browser developer tools, one panel will be the network requests.

It could be the accepts header then… check if the request includes accetps: application/json

In my experience that is almost always the server returning an html error page.

Start with inspecting that actual response the first character is probably <. The rest of it is likely to be a “not found” or “internal server error” (being the most common) page.

Then look at logs…

I voted for Kang!

It’s one half of ‘bread and circuses’.

FU Dell BIOS and your F11 b/s.

It’s absolutely not my place to gatekeep feminism, but…

IMHO They’re not practicing feminism (defined as empowering women) the trans exclusion turns it into radical misandry (disempowering men) by excluding any trans people from their definition of women: they consider transfem and transmasc people as men.

I remember being at a bar… Queue out the door for the ladies, mens almost empty.

One of the girls in the queue said something like “I wish we could use the mens” as a comedy throwaway.

I said “do it, if you’re comfortable doing so, we don’t care”. I mean, there are still stalls with doors right?

Half a dozen very relieved ladies bolted for the mens.

I like to think I made some people’s evening just a little better that night.

despite evidence of

In a nut shell.

Pretty much why everyone just uses json or, heaven forbid, plain text for trivial data.

Broken clock…

Aaah, SOAP.

Yo dawg, I heard you like XML over HTTP so I put XML over HTTP in your XML over HTTP.

“Uughh”

Going to shout out to Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality.

Treats some of more egregiously stupid world building in Rowling’s works with humour.

Accidentally good.

It kills the click bait page view centric advertising model.

I meant extreme for this very specific case. If every other features of the product is satisfactory for OP then dumping the whole product is extreme.

No product is perfect in every way for every customer. Modifying a product that you’ve already bought is an entirely reasonable thing to do.

Returning it seems extreme to me… But I’m happy modding things like that.

Stick a piece of paper or card over the button/LED such that you can still depress it… Iterate/repeat until you’re satisfied.

Gnome makes absolutely no promises of version compatibility for extensions.

You’re stuck waiting for an extension dev to update to support the new gnome version.

Ah. I figured it was plausible enough to ask for a source rather than out right rejected as bullshit.

I see now that was a “got a source to back up that outlandish claim?”